Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers release Jacob Eason and Preston Williams


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I still believe that Dalton will be let go and they'll just keep Young and Corral. Dalton is only here for the transition. 

I doubt this. Dalton started as a rookie, has won playoff games, and been in the league a long time, and he is a servicable back up QB. Corral hasn't done anything but sit out his rookie year with an injury (not his fault).

Edited by Louie
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it’s unlikely that the Panthers keep just three quarterbacks on their roster throughout the summer, Carolina might want to give Corral an extended look behind Dalton and Young. With just three players taking reps at quarterback, Corral could have heavy training camp and preseason workloads, which could factor into his evaluation by the new staff.

Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article275556346.html#storylink=cpy

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

While it’s unlikely that the Panthers keep just three quarterbacks on their roster throughout the summer, Carolina might want to give Corral an extended look behind Dalton and Young. With just three players taking reps at quarterback, Corral could have heavy training camp and preseason workloads, which could factor into his evaluation by the new staff.

Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article275556346.html#storylink=cpy

and hopefully up his trade value.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Louie said:

I doubt this. Dalton started as a rookie, has won playoff games, and been in the league a long time, and he is a servicable back up QB. Corral hasn't done anything but sit out his rookie year with an injury (not his fault).

He also signed a two year $10M(8 gtd) contract. He's on the roster for at least 1 year, maybe Corral beats him out as the backup next year. I'm more curious if they keep all of them on the 53. Corral might no clear waivers for the practice squad depending on how injuries go throughout the league, and how he looks in preseason

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you will simply continue to discount Corral as a legit talent. It makes some sense, I guess, but it makes more sense to say, "Here is a very talented kid who got a raw deal his rookie year, so let's see what he's got with sound coaching and development, because the sky just may be the limit."

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Active slot limits are stupid anyways. It's just a way for the teams to save a few million dollars a year on their contracts by not giving those players their game day bonuses

 

Or...Teams use those extra slots for players they don't want poached if they were to put them on the PS.

 

2 hours ago, Camp Fodder said:

This. I know injuries, not fair blah blah. That’s what the practice squad is for. 

 

You put the wrong player on the PS and he will get poached. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Some of you will simply continue to discount Corral as a legit talent. It makes some sense, I guess, but it makes more sense to say, "Here is a very talented kid who got a raw deal his rookie year, so let's see what he's got with sound coaching and development, because the sky just may be the limit."

 

And as of right now it looks as though he just may get a lot of opportunities to show just what he's got. What with only 3 QBs on the roster at this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...