Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rotoworld blurb on Terrace Marshall: “sneaky” fantasy upside


Recommended Posts

Rotoworld (I’m never calling it sportsEDGE) is primarily a fantasy sports analysis site and they’re just basing this off Mike Kaye. 
 

but still it’s may and you know you’re starving for content 

Panthers beat writer Mike Kaye believes Terrace Marshall is "on the cusp of a breakout campaign."

After a down rookie season in 2021, Marshall would post a 28-490-1 line in his second season while averaging 17.5 YPR. The former second-round pick is expected to compete for a starting role with rookie Jonathan Mingo this offseason. Still, Kaye believes Marshall will ultimately "out-snap and out-produce his rookie counterpart" this season. Under a new head coach in Frank Reich, and with Bryce Young now under center, Marshall could have some sneaky upside in fantasy. He's currently going in the the final rounds of fantasy football drafts

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll probably have our top 4 receivers each get like 600 yards and Thielen will probably snake most of the TD's. Only fantasy guy i'd take is Sanders and maybe Hurst later on just because TE is very limited overall in fantasy. Maybe stash one or two of our wr's on the bench

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone with eyes saw him lighting up preseason his rookie year. What happened after that and up until Wilks took over is all because of Matt Rhule and his band of clowns.

He has everything it takes to be a legitimate threat in the league.

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Kaye has a new pod, discusses the receivers around the 6 minute mark. Better than nothing which is what the Panthers have been giving us. Other teams have like 4-5 episodes of offseason footage already and we have to wait 3 more weeks for our draft video lol. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, La Pantera said:

TMs production to date was affected by Rhule. He was hardly on the field as a rookie. And looked to be head the same direction till Rhule was canned.

 

You can be hopeful TMJ takes the next step but “hardly on the field” is wrong. DJ and Robby were WR1 and WR2 and for the 13 games TMJ played, he received 48% of the snaps. He was WR3 and was on the field half the time. He was WR2 last year and was on the field for 77% of the snaps (missed 3 games) and that was even with Robby being WR2 until being traded.  

Again, blame everything else but don’t say he didn’t have enough snaps, because it isn’t true. Personally, I think Mingo has a better shot because I haven’t ever felt like TMJ got enough consistent separation, hence so many people thinking he barely played.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Mike Kaye has a new pod, discusses the receivers around the 6 minute mark. Better than nothing which is what the Panthers have been giving us. Other teams have like 4-5 episodes of offseason footage already and we have to wait 3 more weeks for our draft video lol. 

 

Kaye doesn't exactly display a lot of confidence in our X receiver position...Basically up to TMJ or Mingo to win that job. Will be interesting to see if anyone can really do something against Jaycee in camp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marshall had so much upside coming out of the draft and that LSU WR farm but the stink of Rhule and crappy QB play has hindered him his first couple years. I do think he still has some of that upside but it can be harder to reach after getting off to such a rough start (relatively speaking). I do think he’s being slept on, but it also would not really surprise me to see him as the #4.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...