Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Minicamp


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

Deonte is a huge SOB also. He was "playing" D-line in a drill with Moton and Mays and dwarfed them.

What a terrible pick that was with a stud G sitting there for the taking. All the G talk with Corbett out and BC rated as our weak spot and Deonte is never mentioned even though he’s in year 3. I know it was a 6th, but Smith, Mays and Norwell types are around. Maybe they were considered more hard working than pure talent or maybe they had the talent but slipped due to non-football reasons, they are still the chances you want to take not projects that need a huge amount of work to be able to play at a high level. Glad we learned with Mays. Hopefully, we keep sticking to that formula for day 3 picks because we are a long way from being a deep team.

Edited by WhoKnows
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/14/2023 at 6:57 AM, ladypanther said:

@The Huddler...why in the world did you poo that post?  😕

i guess i left a skid mark and didnt notice

 

 

its these adds taking up half the page and times perfectly to change the composition of my screen where i try to clcik something and the add magically pops up and makes me click the add

 

fugin sleasy bullshit by zod

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

i guess i left a skid mark and didnt notice

 

 

its these adds taking up half the page and times perfectly to change the composition of my screen where i try to clcik something and the add magically pops up and makes me click the add

 

fugin sleasy bullshit by zod

Thanks for responding.  But you know, this site is not free.  Ads are an online  fact of life these days. Beats me having to pay for it.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

zods content decrease and ads increased its bullshit

 

 

i paid for a year of "all pro" where i was getting bonus insider content.  it was a scam. just a dude offering his subjective opinion there was no insider info

 

i spent actual hard earned money into this site im entitled to my opinion. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ladypanther said:

Thanks for responding.  But you know, this site is not free.  Ads are an online  fact of life these days. Beats me having to pay for it.

Ads and the bullshit screen covering banners that can’t be closed and block posts with no way to resolve the problem except refresh and hope it doesn’t happen again are two different things. I’m perfectly ok with scrolling past conventional ads but the ones here cripple the ability to read people’s posts sometimes. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Ads and the bullshit screen covering banners that can’t be closed and block posts with no way to resolve the problem except refresh and hope it doesn’t happen again are two different things. I’m perfectly ok with scrolling past conventional ads but the ones here cripple the ability to read people’s posts sometimes. 

I have ad blocker on my phone. Never had an issue since then. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, The Huddler said:

i guess i left a skid mark and didnt notice

 

 

its these adds taking up half the page and times perfectly to change the composition of my screen where i try to clcik something and the add magically pops up and makes me click the add

 

fugin sleasy bullshit by zod

The ads have gotten absolutely ridiculous. It's almost like one of those trap websites Facebook tries to get you to click on with endless pop up ads and crap that sends you down a never ending rabbit hole.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ricky Prickles said:

The ads have gotten absolutely ridiculous. It's almost like one of those trap websites Facebook tries to get you to click on with endless pop up ads and crap that sends you down a never ending rabbit hole.

Get an ad blocker app. I have not seen any ads since the egg shell penis ads were popular.  Most ad blocker apps are free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ladypanther said:

Thanks for responding.  But you know, this site is not free.  Ads are an online  fact of life these days. Beats me having to pay for it.

90% of the post here are for  fodder ..   but there are some Panther ( gold ) nuggets here as well. I live on the coast and for me to find any Panther information is pretty much impossible. My local  TV won't cover them on a daily or weekly bases. I don't want to pay to listen to someone's pod cast to hear his/her opinion when their opinion is no better than mine. This is free and it's going to have ads.  As others have mentioned, there are pop up blockers.  

If someone doesn't like this site for what ever reason..  stop visiting it.  If you don't , then you too have discovered this free site with pop ups is better than what ever else you use to find Panthers news or discuss Panther news .  Enjoy Free 

 Evidently I don't see them to the extent some of you do and I do not use a pop up blocker. I get no pop ups,   just a 1/4 of the screen on the right side has ads,  and  something at the bottom.  ( then again, I might be one of ZOD's  chosen ones LOLOL )

Edited by OceanPanther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

The ads have gotten absolutely ridiculous. It's almost like one of those trap websites Facebook tries to get you to click on with endless pop up ads and crap that sends you down a never ending rabbit hole.

Be careful. I got my entire old account banned and posts deleted for saying how bad the ads were before. Don’t care about ads, just the ones that make the site hard to use.

Edited by WhoKnows
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BPA comes with the caveat of positional value and roster need included. Never let the latter two completely overwhelm the first, however. Our FO seems to lean heavily into "WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POTENTIALZ!!!" as a fourth category and often it seems as the #1 overall pursuit. With as many needs as this roster has, I am not going to get upset over a real roster upgrade at WR versus some reach at EDGE or whatever other extreme needs we have. Overall, I want to see the roster get better. There is far, far, FAR more than one offseason of work left to get this roster into the top 10-12 in the NFL. That should be the goal. 
    • I would say we are more likely to get smoked by Tampa, blast Seattle and then perplexingly lose to Tampa again. 
    • In general, Dave Canales tends to target his TE's the least frequently of any position group(WR/RB/TE) during his three years of running an NFL offense.  However, if you notice this percentage has crept up over time. 2025 is the first year that TE has eclipsed RB in target percentage. Production has also gone up in 2025. This is a percentage of total output in each category. Canales has always used a very TE heavy offense. In fact, on average his offensive formations are 2 or 3 TE sets roughly 80% of all offensive formations. So, the question may be, with this uptick in total TE output, could an elite or top tier TE make a significant impact? I believe there is some evidence this may be the case. Here are a look at TE snaps and Cade Otten specifically. These are the snap percentages for all rostered TE's in every Dave Canales offense. The bolded cell is Cade Otten's whopping 96.46% of total snap counts in the single year he was in the Dave Canales offense in Tampa. This was overwhelmingly his career high. His production was higher with less utilization in 2024, however.    In conclusion, while I don't anticipate ever seeing a top 5 producing/Pro Bowl caliber TE performance in a Dave Canales offense, there does appear to be some evidence that an actual upgrade in our TE room would actually lead to increasing overall offensive efficiency. I think Otten's utilization rate does indicate that the splitting of time between our relatively even TE group would cede significant snaps if a far superior option were available. I believe this is an area we could(and should have this past offseason/draft) made a more concerted effort to get a dynamic TE threat, after the apparent failure that J. Sanders appears to have been.  
×
×
  • Create New...