Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alvin Kamara expected to be suspended


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, DJ feed me moore said:

could see goodells incompetent ass having this linger into the season. hopefully he's not available week 2. 

I’m willing to bet he’ll be out week 2, he’ll probably get 6 game’s reduced to 4 after an appeal. Or even if it’s 4 game’s reduced to 3 after appeal. I looked at few suspensions from the past Bryant McKinney (Vikings DT) suspended in 08 four games for a brawl outside a nightclub club very similar crime  I’d expect a similar punishment.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

I follow the Saints board daily (and used to check the Falcons board, but it's gone, if it migrated somewhere else, I can't find it) 

Here's the link to the new Falcons board.

falcons.boards.net

They were initially threatening to be very selective about who would be joining, in effort to run off some trolls. I think they backed off of that to some degree, but you must be a registered member to access the board now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

4 to 6 games seems to be what they feel will happen....Goodell wants to hear Kamara's side of the story before deciding.  

Report I saw said his story was that the guy called his friend ugly and threatened to fight them. So you see he was totally justified in stomping the man out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

I haven’t kept up with the situation. When rappaport said there was a video of the incident, I looked it up. Pretty disgusting, that dude could have legit been killed. I also happened to watch the video on a New Orleans news channel report where they showed the video to New Orleans residents and asked what they thought. They all defended Kamara and said he shouldn’t be punished. Classy.

I mean when you see how this place defends JR who should also be in jail…don’t see how it’s much different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...