Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's Jets joint practice Day 1 (8.9.2023)


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Panthering said:

Just doesn't quiiiiiiite have the arm strength to shove it in there. Good play by the CB too

A combination of a few things....

Tremble (?) didn't come back to the ball and just flattened his route which made it easy for Echols to swoop underneath. 

CB watched QB the whole way and great focus to reel it in. 

Bryce didn't put a ton of zip on it and it doesn't look like he helped himself at all by zeroing in on the TE the whole way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

A combination of a few things....

Tremble (?) didn't come back to the ball and just flattened his route which made it easy for Echols to swoop underneath. 

CB watched QB the whole way and great focus to reel it in. 

Bryce didn't put a ton of zip on it and it doesn't look like he helped himself at all by zeroing in on the TE the whole way. 

Chark

and yeah, a tad late and a misjudge on the velocity needed to get it there. He certainly has the arm strength to make the throw, likely didn't expect the CB to react down so quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Bad? That's a good play by the defender. If that's the worst he does then I wouldn't call that bad. That's great defense by the corner.

Or terrible by the corner.  Both corners rolled up to the under.  If Bryce had seen it the wide player was uncovered on the go.  It was a blown coverage that they were fortunate on.  Not sure who was right and who was wrong for the defense, but something was blown there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

crying about a fluky interception at that. 

 

but muh pick 6!!1!1!!1!!!11!!!!

The same poster crying about Young being too small all draft is the same one crying about him throwing an INT in a scrimmage.  I would have never guessed....  Man when he throws a legit INT that person is going to explode.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...