Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers trying to trade Corral?


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ForJimmy said:

It depends on how long our other QBs are out for. He may even need to come in and just finish a game. They made this new rule after watching the Niners struggle with it. 

I get the new rule but what you are not getting is that he has to be on the final 53 for it to take effect.  Going to to the 3rd qb in a real game is rare as fug and I think Reich is old school enough to know this.   In closing I really really doubt this staff wants to burn a roster spot to just try and develop corral and maybe just maybe have to use in him a clusterfug of a game if the 2 qbs ahead of him go down.  I could be wrong but we will see once the final cuts are announced.

 

IMO what probably happens is we either trade him for pennies on the dollar or we try to stash him on the PS

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

but they still count toward your 53 man roster, so essentially he would be taking a space of someone who would in theory participate in a game on the 53

You can also call up 2 practice squad players a week at any other position, the emergency QB has to be on the 53. Some teams will probably gamble with some backup/special teams guys on the practice squad in order to keep the 3 qbs on the 53

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

You can also call up 2 practice squad players a week at any other position, the emergency QB has to be on the 53. Some teams will probably gamble with some backup/special teams guys on the practice squad in order to keep the 3 qbs on the 53

yeah so I am thinking luton is the guy they stash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "if we're down to QB3 who cares the season is over anyway" logic is fine from the perspective of a fan. But if it happens it will be in large part due to the oline which means someone making the decisions is going to be facing some serious heat. And honestly knowing how these things go for the Panthers I wouldn't be surprised if Corral ends up on a contender and looks competent when needed. Then we'll see the heel turn and people saying why did we trade/cut him we're so stupid. It's predictable.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

We would get so little for him it would be better to keep him as the 3rd emergency QB. He is getting familiar with our system and still has potential IMO. 

He was drafted to a team where it made sense for him to be. He now exists on a team where it really doesn’t.  I mean, from Matt’s perspective.  If I was him I would have nicely asked the front office to trade me.   I’d want to go somewhere with an unstable QB position and where it likely could get unstable soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

The "if we're down to QB3 who cares the season is over anyway" logic is fine from the perspective of a fan. But if it happens it will be in large part due to the oline which means someone making the decisions is going to be facing some serious heat. And honestly knowing how these things go for the Panthers I wouldn't be surprised if Corral ends up on a contender and looks competent when needed. Then we'll see the heel turn and people saying why did we trade/cut him we're so stupid. It's predictable.

maybe but how many times in a nfl game do you see a team needing a 3rd qb?

 

For the record I said the second he got drafted he should be qb#2 on this team and go from there, what rhule and co did to him was criminal, now the timing is just not in his favor

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I get the new rule but what you are not getting is that he has to be on the final 53 for it to take effect.  Going to to the 3rd qb in a real game is rare as fug and I think Reich is old school enough to know this.   In closing I really really doubt this staff wants to burn a roster spot to just try and develop corral and maybe just maybe have to use in him a clusterfug of a game if the 2 qbs ahead of him go down.  I could be wrong but we will see once the final cuts are announced.

 

IMO what probably happens is we either trade him for pennies on the dollar or we try to stash him on the PS

I understand that 53 man roster rule, but he would be replacing a player that wouldn’t even be dressing out on game day. The emergency QB doesn’t count against the active game day players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...