Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did we just pass drafting Cam Newton Jr….


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Brace Yourself Here We Go GIF by MOODMAN
 

“big athlete man throw football”. “Big man going to be next Cam Newton”

 

the Physically athletic ability is about where the comparison stops

 

Cam had more touch on his passes and ability to read the field as a Freshman at Florida than ARich has had up to this point in his career.

 

Arich is like Uncle Rico.  Can throw it over that mountain.  But can barely hit a touch pass.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richardson isn’t as strong as Cam but I’d say he’s more athletic. He put up impressive numbers at the combine and I can’t imagine Cam doing that standing flip he did there. It’s ignored in the comparisons because they’re both imposing guys but I think it puts AR on a much different trajectory than Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Why are Panthers fans so obsessed with talking about other teams rookie QBs?

They're not. They're obsessed with one singular human who made their miserable lives better for a handful of years ... many years ago. Now he's long gone and they can't get that feeling back. Chasing the dragon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

He was a much better passer and could read the field better. Many people thought AR needed a year to sit because he is still pretty raw as a passer. AR isn’t dropping 4000 passing yards like Cam did his 16 game rookie season.

Ah I see. Agree to disagree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Go watch his FL tape versus Newton's Auburn tape.

Newton was a sensational College QB - that offence was predicated on the threat he posed with his legs. That doesn't make you more developed as a passer. But again, it's everyone's opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Carolina Panthers messed up not giving Coach Wilks a chance to Coach.  Tepper & Co are  lost in managing the team, it seems! 
 

They should’ve given Cam a mentorship

job, too. It’s kind of dirty how they did Cam, again, in his 2nd stint. 😞. Rhule was so dirty to Cam! 😱

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...