Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Team Has Been Hamstrung for Several Years


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Bingo. We haven't been the best at putting players into the best position to succeed and maximize their skill sets.

Oline was improving at the end of the year so what did they do? Change the scheme away from their personnel's strengths and stopped running the ball. And that is with one of those being a top 10 pick 2 years ago. Freaking dismal approach. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This entire mess can honestly be traced back to Gettleman. We got to the Super Bowl in 2015 off of legacy/Hurney/Rivera players, and all Gettleman did before and after it was get rid of all our wide receivers in 2014 and then all of our cornerbacks in 2016. The second Hurney era had enough hits to keep us competitive for a handful of years but inept coaching and an utter inability to find any success on the offensive line or quarterback position ruined whatever time there was left.

Now we're several years in to Fetterer and we still have no offensive line, no wide receivers, bad cornerbacks, and a big question mark at QB. These have been glaring issues for years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

We've been generally terrible at drafting for several years and its an huge contributing factor to our losing mostly since 2017. Let's go over last 10 years:

Interesting take. While I do generally agree that better drafting would generate more depth and a better overall team I wanted to compare to the other teams in the league to see if the data supports that claim.

Carolina vs the NFL

To be as objective as possible I used the "DrAV" metric from PFR to determine if a player was a "contributor". To qualify as a contributor, a player's DrAV had to meet or exceed the median DrAV from their draft class. Re-stated, if a player was in the upper half of their class, they were counted as a "contributor" for the team that drafted them. I'll admit there is probably a better way to do this, I just wanted something quick.

Since it took a bit to scrape this all together, I only went back as far as 2016. I also calculated the hit rate for each team or # contributors / # picks. Here are those results.

image.png.54bca518732f8e45726862d80f3a060c.png

My takeaway is that, over the time span I looked at, the Panthers are slightly below average in terms of finding contributors in the draft. Their 43% rate is just below the league average of 45%. Surprisingly, Philidelphia actually has a lower contribution rate from their draft picks (40% overall); if anything, that should give us all hope that drafting isn't everything to a team's success.

I also found it interesting that our NFC south foes have all done a better job of finding contributors in the draft: ATL at a whopping 63% clip, NO at 56%, and TB at 53%.

Carolina GMs

For those interested I also zoomed in on the Panthers and broke things down by GM; It's crazy that we have had 3 in such a short time period. The percentages shown are the hit rate.

image.png.644f90af69e3d7d3eabf97382629b6f7.png

My takeaway here is that the jury is still out on Fitterer. Despite the lack of star power, his 2021 draft did end up producing a decent amount of value for the team. His 2022 draft on the other hand was rough. How much of that is him vs Rhule vs the new coaching staff wanting different players is hard to tell. Note that I am not interested in looking at the 2023 draft until after the season.

Edited by Evil Hurney
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s what too much change will do, hc x gm combo is pivotal, we’ve been through various gm’s and coaches since tepper bought the team, combine that with terrible hires sticking along too long and this is the product you get 

and what little talent we had we traded away for less talented players (jury still out on young of course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, TN05 said:

This entire mess can honestly be traced back to Gettleman. We got to the Super Bowl in 2015 off of legacy/Hurney/Rivera players, and all Gettleman did before and after it was get rid of all our wide receivers in 2014 and then all of our cornerbacks in 2016. The second Hurney era had enough hits to keep us competitive for a handful of years but inept coaching and an utter inability to find any success on the offensive line or quarterback position ruined whatever time there was left.

Now we're several years in to Fetterer and we still have no offensive line, no wide receivers, bad cornerbacks, and a big question mark at QB. These have been glaring issues for years

It’s 2023, you win in the NFL with elite safeties and punters.  None of those other positions you mentioned matter anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

Yea some of those are debatable. Chin had a good year but recently hasn't done much I kinda struggled to justify adding him. I guess by my lower standards he's been a consistent contributor but idk how good he's been outside year 1.

Chin is one of the biggest mysteries on the team to me. He balled out his rookie year and was in the DROY discussion and what do we do? Move him to safety where you hardly ever even know he’s on the field. I’ll never understand it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...