Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ladies and Gentlemen... The Maestro is in the building!


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, AceBoogie said:

He had like one incompletion in the second half? Moved the ball well. Offensive line couldn’t hold up. Bryce played well today. 

How did Teddy Bridgewater not teach everyone that completions don’t matter, but the type of completion is what matters. 
 

Bryce is basically handing the ball off dinking the ball around. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AceBoogie said:

He had like one incompletion in the second half? Moved the ball well. Offensive line couldn’t hold up. Bryce played well today. 

It’s hilarious how quick all the “ I don’t care if we win I just wanna see flashes” dissolved into “its Bryce’s fault we lost!”

it’s become more and more abundantly clear that we have a smooth brain contingent of posters who define “flashes” as “UGH THROW THE BOMB BRYCE I WANNA BE EXCITED”

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

It’s hilarious how quick all the “ I don’t care if we win I just wanna see flashes” dissolved into “its Bryce’s fault we lost!”

it’s become more and more abundantly clear that we have a smooth brain contingent of posters who define “flashes” as “UGH THROW THE BOMB BRYCE I WANNA BE EXCITED”

The loss doesn't bother me. The lack of flashes do. Where were the flashes? He made one nice play where he scrambled and found a receiver for about 10. That was the only plus play if the day that I can recall that I wouldn't expect any NFL caliber backup QB to make.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You don't trade everything for Teddy Bridgewater. We crucified Teddy Bridgewater for this. Bryce basically threw nothing but screens and checkdowns 90% of his drop backs. His one deep ball was badly underthrown despite his receiver being grabbed and slowed down.  The yards per completion are a big problem. We're just not offering anything with Bryce to vertically threaten the defense.

Teddy Bridgewater was a veteran. Bryce is a 22 year old rookie. He took the plays that were there and made throws down field when they were there. The team has to be better around him. A number of drives were killed due to either the offensive line not blocking or senseless penalties. That’s not on 9. 
 

If you came away from this game discouraged by Bryce Young that’s a you problem. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Growl said:

It’s hilarious how quick all the “ I don’t care if we win I just wanna see flashes” dissolved into “its Bryce’s fault we lost!”

it’s become more and more abundantly clear that we have a smooth brain contingent of posters who define “flashes” as “UGH THROW THE BOMB BRYCE I WANNA BE EXCITED”

I'm not seeing a single person saying Bryce was the reason we lost.  Reich is far and away getting the most fruit hurled at him post-play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Growl said:

It’s hilarious how quick all the “ I don’t care if we win I just wanna see flashes” dissolved into “its Bryce’s fault we lost!”

it’s become more and more abundantly clear that we have a smooth brain contingent of posters who define “flashes” as “UGH THROW THE BOMB BRYCE I WANNA BE EXCITED”

I think it's becoming more and more crystallized that the "smooth brain contingent" are those that keep making excuses for this sorry ass organization.

They traded the farm for a guy they don't trust to throw the ball beyond the line of scrimmage.  No one is asking him to drop back and sling it 20 yards every play - the problem is that he can't throw it 20 yards AT ALL.

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...