Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFT reporting Caleb Williams wants partial ownership stake in whichever franchise drafts him

Dorian Gray

By Dorian Gray,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

I can’t imagine who put that idea into his head. Being that delusional is a huge red flag and will only get worse with money. I can still see a team drafting him, and then telling him he has to abide by the contract with the NFLPA. You can’t be a player and part owner anyway. This is just mind numbingly stupid

He's getting a poo ton of money already via NIL, I think thats where all this craziness is starting from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Panther'sBigD said:

I’m all for it. Why does everyone instinctively poo on the guy actually producing the product rather than the old rich guys who mostly inherited their ownership stake? 

No draft pick has ever produced diddly poo in the NFL at the time acquired by a team.  And most disappoint.  QB bust rate is not incredibly high.  

that’s just giving away franchises to random people that might work out and might not.  That might be with your team a year or 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Panther'sBigD said:

I’m all for it. Why does everyone instinctively poo on the guy actually producing the product rather than the old rich guys who mostly inherited their ownership stake? 

Considering he hasnt played not one damn snap in the NFL he could be a huge bust. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, joemac said:

He's getting a poo ton of money already via NIL, I think thats where all this craziness is starting from.

Probably some truth to that.  Quick money makes many people start being silly between the ears 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Panther'sBigD said:

I’m all for it. Why does everyone instinctively poo on the guy actually producing the product rather than the old rich guys who mostly inherited their ownership stake? 

They can do that if they want, but math tells us that giving away 5% to every 1st round pick means teams will eventually run out of shares to give away.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PghPanther Mentor

PghPanther

Posted
Posted

Player Rule #1 in the NFL - You need the NFL but the NFL doesn't need you.

Player Rule #2 in the NFL - You are replaceable.

Player Rule #3 in the NFL - See #1 and #2.

Player Rule #4 in the NFL - If you think #3 isn't applicable to you.......then learn to update your resume and how does selling cars or insurance sound fella? 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, joemac said:

This delusional MF has a better shot of getting equity in a nail salon.  He got EXPOSED against ND last week.  Bryce never had 1 college game as bad as Williams had last week. 

He looked terrible against Arizona too.

What's most alarming is he looked terrible against two completely different approaches. Arizona basically didn't rush. They focused on keeping him in the pocket and dropping as many as possible into coverage. Williams couldn't throw the ball against this defense but it allowed him to do just enough with his legs to get the W. Notre Dame blitzed him and heated him up and he turned the ball over in droves.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • toldozer
      Canales is holding us back

      By toldozer · Posted

      I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • frankw
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By frankw · Posted

      You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • Bama Panther
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By Bama Panther · Posted

      It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...