Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Colts at Panthers Gameday Thread


Mage
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Aged well

Yeah that’s why I quote tweeted myself saying my bad. Poo happens, can’t be right all the time. Many analyst were saying how good he was out of backfield this off-season, heck I think Frank said something about him being a three down back that can do it it all. Even in Philly he had 500 yards receiving, but hey thanks for calling me out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cdparr7 said:

Although Frank gets a lot of the blame. I still say Fitterer owns most of it. He’s the one that is supposed to be in control of the roster this year, and these guys are terrible. We have guys that wouldn’t even make other teams PS.

LaBryan Ray? Nick Thurman? 4 TEs? Really?

 

that’s not even mentioning all the other boneheaded decisions he’s made.

like just look at the team.

Agree..plus how many draft picks were traded for bad decisions 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayboogieman said:

For all the Stroud lovers, he would look just as bad as Young on this team. So would Richardson, Levis, Williams, Maye, and rookie Cam Newton. This team is just the perfect storm that ruins QBs.

But would Young look as good as Stroud? He setting records on a bad team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

If anyone wants an example of why our society is the way it is - you have a professional athlete like Sanders making like 30 million dollars and not earning one cent of it.  Basically a thief. 

he didn't write up that contract

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Eh, when does Frank swallow his pride and bench Bryce?  His eventual downfall here was his downfall in Indy.  He's too loyal to his QBs.  When it's not working, change it up.  We all know what they say about continuously doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

How is benching Bryce going to fix the run game or the defense or the OL, all of which have regressed under Reich?

I'm not even trying to get into a debate about Bryce.  But this entire team, top to bottom, looks worse than it ever did under Matt freakin' Rhule.  Reich is TERRIBLE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...