Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Antonio "Wilks" is why Frank has to be fired tomorrow


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

 

Even in their first loss today under Antonio Pierce, you can see how the Raiders were playing and had a chance until the very end. This was a 12.5 point underdog that could have very easily won this game. This is the same team that had no life/pulse under McDaniels.

 

Antonio Durran Pierce is a leader of men

Steve Wilks is a leader of men

 

Matt Rhule, Josh McDaniels, Frank Reich are Billionaire CONMEN 

 

usatsi-antonio-pierce-raiders.webp

1445022526.0.jpg

Edited by TheBigKat
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thennek said:

I sometimes think one reason why this team is terrible is Perhaps the locker room was lost when Wilks was not retained. I get the impression he was very respected and the players played hard for him. 

That's not an impression, it's a fact. Just look at the players nobody is chewing each other out. Guys aren't showing emotion. Wilks had guys motivated to play for him. Frank is just here. I haven't seen a single player rave about him in the locker room.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

That's not an impression, it's a fact. Just look at the players nobody is chewing each other out. Guys aren't showing emotion. Wilks had guys motivated to play for him. Frank is just here. I haven't seen a single player rave about him in the locker room.

This team doesn't consist of Panthers. There are maybe 3 left. We just have a bunch of dudes wearing the same jersey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Stop with this Wilks BS. 9ers D isn't that elite. They're good and much better than us though. But stop acting like he's some top tier coach. Purdy won the game for the 9ers today. And btw, the players LOVED Rivera.

One thing I've heard is Wilks coaches from the booth and Ryans was on the sidelines. He was connected to his players constantly. It's rumored to have made quite the difference in how the defense has performed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, travisura said:

Just because Frank was the wrong decision, doesn't mean Wilks was the right one. 

I was ok with going in a different direction....................BUT NOT FOR FUGGIN FRANK REICH! If you were just going to hire a retread coach who literally just got fired midseason, you should have just rolled with the guy who got us back to competency.

It's the same as the Cam situation. I was fine moving on from him as the time had come.............BUT NOT FOR FUGGIN TEDDY BRIDGEWATER!!!!!! I'm starting to actually hate this franchise.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...