Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers GameDay thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

Plenty would.  Tepper is generous financially to who he fires 

there are two sides to this coin

1. From Tepper, Reich was given everything he asked for..and he did not produce..if he didn’t like the expectations and terms,  don’t take the job 

look, I went to Maryland when Frank was there and Boomer as well, he knows this is a production league and game over game, there is zero improvement on what is his ‘specialty’.   That, is not acceptable 

What will be different next year with these people and the answer is nothing 

2.  the flip side, is if there was a force on the Bryce pick or insertion into game planning.   Again Reich is a grown ass man, in a tough guy’s sport, assert yourself.  Everyone on this board has worked for a bully.  Bitch slap back or leave.  If he is fired, he’s set for the rest of his life 

frankly, I’m so sick of Frank looking like a whipped dog.  Grow a freaking backbone 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, chbright said:

Interested in the late panthers north (Bills) game. Old friend Joe Brady is back game 2 as the OC after old dark horse HC for panther fans, Ken Dorsey, was fired 2 weeks ago. Interested in seeing if Brady continues his success and we let an actual OC go way too early. Cause the last 2/3 for the Panthers have been worse than Joe. I am not opposed to a reunion if the Bills dont take the interm tag off at seasons end and they look better. The Bills may go big splash hire because they believe they are in win now mode.

I hadn't realized Dorsey was fired. Honestly I was surprised he got the job in the first place. Being Cam Newton's QB coach helped him I guess. I remember at one time someone here suggested interviewing him for the head coaching position which was absolutely hilarious.

As for Brady that could go either way but I wouldn't be shocked if they look better for a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...