Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Suck For Allar in 2025?


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Lamar Jackson was there for the taking in the off-season. The Nat'l media pushed for us to sign him. Tepper didn't even make a call.

 

Now we stuck with Bryce Young who most people know he doesn't have franchise QB talent. These will be a few wasted years and we don't have our picks on top of it.

 

In Tepper We Bust!

The Ravens were never going to let Lamar walk.  They were just playing some hard ball.  If anyone made an offer they would throw money his way and get a deal done.  They are too smart of a franchise to let him go like that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BY9Franchise said:

Oh how I wish we had just ridden darnold to #1 overall or picked Stroud lol.

What a crappy season when you can't even root for getting the top pick.

The issue would have been getting a coach to sign on for that kind of shelling. Most likely Reich doesn't come here, who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

The Ravens were never going to let Lamar walk.  They were just playing some hard ball.  If anyone made an offer they would throw money his way and get a deal done.  They are too smart of a franchise to let him go like that.

Yeah the take that we easily could have signed him if we wanted to and Ravens not matching is something else.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Martin said:

Yeah the take that we easily could have signed him if we wanted to and Ravens not matching is something else.

They were willing to trade him prior to the tag if they got a ridiculous offer, rumor was 3 1sts and 2nds and maybe a player or 2. After the tag it was just a matter of matching another team's offer if their was one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/29/2023 at 7:55 PM, CamWhoaaCam said:

Lamar Jackson was there for the taking in the off-season. The Nat'l media pushed for us to sign him. Tepper didn't even make a call.

 

Now we stuck with Bryce Young who most people know he doesn't have franchise QB talent. These will be a few wasted years and we don't have our picks on top of it.

 

In Tepper We Bust!

I'm with you on this. I remember many people pushing back on Jackson, and talking like B-more didn't want him. They just didn't want him on a crazy stupid contract. They always wanted him. Now look...

He was the surest thing, and still is out of any 2023 QB. Hell, he's one of the best out of all the QBs in the league. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...