Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Players on this team worth keeping?


TNPanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Personally I feel like you may as well hold a fire sale, especially on defence and build the strongest offence you can through draft and free agency.

Yeah we will have a historically bad defence… we will lose a lot of games in-spite of our offence but we will achieve two things:

1. Determine if Young can deliver with as much investment into the OLine, WR and TE position as we give him.

2. If he can’t, our new rookie QB in 2025 will be walking into a great situation to thrive in, rather than what we tried to do this season by removing playmakers.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Lemory said:

Im seeing people say Bozeman. Other than being a nice guy, what has he done this year? He's getting beat like a drum every week. 

we know what he and the rest of the line can do, we've seen it last year and especially towards the end of the season...they were a bunch of mothertruckers moving people and creating lanes; then Frank came and blew it up, installed scheme that did not suit the players and the rest is history

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, NJPanthers12 said:

This is not fair. Derick brown is a very good player. He’s every bit as good as Brian burns thinks he is.

But the position he plays is more replaceable than most other positions and he's due a big contract. I agree Brown is a great player but one that it could make more sense to trade for picks than to keep. I view every player on this team right now as being expendable. We don't have a single elite blue goose player that should be untouchable. Which is a damn shame and the best reason Fitterer should've been gone by now. Ron/DG/Hurney got us several of those guys.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be fine with a fire sale and see who is left to build around in a massive rebuild. Any good players deserve to go make bank and have a hope of winning before another 3 years and the Panthers need a hard reset while not having to deal with yesterday's promises.

There are a hand full of guys who are keepable but this mess needs to be nuked so nothing carries over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...