Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who do you want at 33?


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

I just need round 2 and 3 picks to be day 1 starters not developmental guys. Imagine one of them being a WR.  I know we need help at NT ,but I feel like thats a hard position to come in as a rookie and start day 1 for anyone who isnt a 1st round pick or Sweat for Texas.  If we can't extend Luvu perhaps Trotter Jr.  Troy Fautana could be plug and play Guard.  Are we going to trust Corbett to come back again? I'd Love for Mays/ Nash to take the spot and run with it but dont trust them to. Got to keep the short guys pocket clean as we can in the middle so he has room to hop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Realistically? They will probably go WR, OL or DL. 
 

What I wish they would do? Draft another QB to compete with Bryce. 
 

He should not be the de facto starter in 2024.

I think we bring in a decent vet. Someone like Tyrod Taylor or Jacoby Brissett or Gardner Minshew to "compete" with Bryce. I say "compete" because I'm not convinced Tepper will let him lose.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ideally they can trade Burns and get back in the 1st for some badly needed starters. Obviously a WR, TE, O-line for offense. Also competition at QB. Young needs to earn the job.

On defense, need D-line and LB. Need to resign Luvu. Secondary is actually pretty good as is if they can resign at reasonable deals. Henderson has looked good this year….not sure what is going on with Chinn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, thennek said:

Ideally they can trade Burns and get back in the 1st for some badly needed starters. Obviously a WR, TE, O-line for offense. Also competition at QB. Young needs to earn the job.

On defense, need D-line and LB. Need to resign Luvu. Secondary is actually pretty good as is if they can resign at reasonable deals. Henderson has looked good this year….not sure what is going on with Chinn. 

agree with all. Chinn is playing out of position. he needs to put on 10-15 pounds and move up to the LB position. I could definitely see him playing more in a Luvu role rather than asking him to cover slots and TEs every play. Those two and a real thumper in the middle would be my wish for the defense. Team could scheme around the lack of a true Edge rusher with that combo. Would rather have a true edge setter at DE.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • From what i see, Canales offense requires a QB that is willing to take chances to maximize the offense. XL is also the kind of receiver that needs a qb to be risky to bring out his full potential. Its just a matter of if Bryce is gonna be that QB.
    • Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.  And last year was asked to be what he was.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
    • I guess you missed the point. His rushing attack was dead last yet his team still performed. That’s not Fox/Rivera ball. His QB also had a career year. Remember the same QB that played for us in the same division and was so bad he was cut?  Carroll coached after Lynch as well. In fact Canales was more involved in the more recent offense with Geno Smith and a good rushing attack. People are taking him wanting a rushing attack and assuming that means we are shutting down our passing attack. Again many of the top offenses like SF, Miami, and Detroit featured strong rushing attacks. 
×
×
  • Create New...