Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No Michael Pittman/Zach Moss/ Anthony Richardson/ Jonathan Taylor.... NO PROBLEM for Steichen


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, TheBigKat said:

NEVER in my life have I seen someone who made so much money but yet so clueless.... As big of the miss CJ was at QB, missing Steichen is going to set us back further

 

This guy is handedly COACH of the YEAR, cooking with backups and 3rd stringers....

 

Look at the Colts offense when they dumped Frank Melatonin Reich and picked up Reich

 

 

IMG_4564.jpg

godalmighty there are a lot of brutal takes in that thread.    There are some posters that need to do some massive mea culpa in here. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Lobo said:

Almost every coach we passed on is doing well right now. Except the one we hired and the one we interviewed twice (Moore). Sheesh Tepper sucks. 

You attract what you are. Every single process (which is all of them) involving Tepper's input has lead to failure. Had we done even just ONE thing the opposite of what Tepper wanted, we would be in a way better spot right now.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Yeh, because we know after one season who the good and bad Qb’s are… 

Your logic would be sound if it weren't for Andre Ware, Jamarcus Russell, Matt Leinart, Zach Wilson, Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch, Johnny Manziel, Vince Young, Heath Shuler, Trey Lance, etc.

Sometimes you just know from the get go.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheBigKat said:

NEVER in my life have I seen someone who made so much money but yet so clueless.... As big of the miss CJ was at QB, missing Steichen is going to set us back further

 

This guy is handedly COACH of the YEAR, cooking with backups and 3rd stringers....

 

Look at the Colts offense when they dumped Frank Melatonin Reich and picked up Reich

 

 

IMG_4564.jpg

Yes

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Your logic would be sound if it weren't for Andre Ware, Jamarcus Russell, Matt Leinart, Zach Wilson, Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch, Johnny Manziel, Vince Young, Heath Shuler, Trey Lance, etc.

Sometimes you just know from the get go.

I would be more hopeful and patient with Bryce if he was a physical specimen like a Cam or Josh Allen. Dude is a 5'9 180 lbs QB with a weak arm, where is the potential?

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Castavar said:

I would be more hopeful and patient with Bryce if he was a physical specimen like a Cam or Josh Allen. Dude is a 5'9 180 lbs QB with a weak arm, where is the potential?

my former HIGH SCHOOL has QBs who are a bigger physical specimen than Young

5
 
QB • Jr. • 6' 2" • 194 lbs
5
 
QB, FS • Sr. • 6' 1" • 180 lbs

 

 

HIGH SCHOOL

https://www.maxpreps.com/nc/charlotte/myers-park-mustangs/football/roster/

 

unfortunately they don't have middle school and elementary school rosters to compare Young's measurable to

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...