Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Even With the Win Today's attendance


BY9Franchise
 Share

Recommended Posts

Is being speculated to be THE LOWEST in a non-pandemic game in NFL history..... Current record low is 15,131 

Today's attendance is expected to be well under 10,000 when the official numbers come out!

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2023/12/17/panthers-fans-empty-stadium-despite-cheap-tickets/71952024007/

KEEP IT UP SEND TEPPER THE MESSAGE!

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BY9Franchise said:

Is being speculated to be THE LOWEST in a non-pandemic game in NFL history..... Current record low is 15,131 

Today's attendance is expected to be well under 10,000 when the official numbers come out!

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2023/12/17/panthers-fans-empty-stadium-despite-cheap-tickets/71952024007/

KEEP IT UP SEND TEPPER THE MESSAGE!

 

The seats are sold regardless of if people are in them

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would literally rather paint a room in my house and watch that paint dry then stand in the rain for 3 hours to watch Bryce and Desmond fuging Riddler noddle arm asses throw volleyballs in said rain. It says more about the NFL than anything. It used to be that bad weather games were an experience even if the teams were bad. Nowadays there are just better things to do. I wish these owners weren’t guaranteed a profit. If it was possible to lose money as an owner Tepper would be forced to sell by the end of this decade. 

Edited by Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...