Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What a game by Bryce


DeSim
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, MGH1989 said:

But I thought he couldn’t make those throws?

What are "those" throws? He still has a lot to prove on his deep ball in the NFL. I'm hoping a full offseason will allow him the opportunity to add some level of bulk and improve his footwork.

It's okay to discuss these things that he can and will work on.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rodeo said:

Only a handful of posters on the board didn't give in to the hatewagon and stayed positive to neutral about Bryce's prospects. Kudos to them but I'm afraid it's not enough. Even if he ends up great, we have several years of sunk cost fallacy to look forward to where people continue to yell that Bryce is terrible because they won't be able to admit they were wrong in season 1.

Lol wut?

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rodeo said:

Only a handful of posters on the board didn't give in to the hatewagon and stayed positive to neutral about Bryce's prospects. Kudos to them but I'm afraid it's not enough. Even if he ends up great, we have several years of sunk cost fallacy to look forward to where people continue to yell that Bryce is terrible because they won't be able to admit they were wrong in season 1.

Apparently it's unreasonable to expect your #1 pick to not be statistically one of the worst starting QB's in the NFL.

Some of you are so emotionally invested you've lowered standards and that's a personal preference.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

Apparently it's unreasonable to expect your #1 pick to not be statistically one of the worst starting QB's in the NFL.

Some of you are so emotionally invested you've lowered standards and that's a personal preference.

Oh Frank get off it with the passive aggressive remarks. Stop being so miserable all the time and enjoy that the Panthers played well today. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, travisura said:

Oh Frank get off it with the passive aggressive remarks. Stop being so miserable all the time and enjoy that the Panthers played well today. 

We lost lol...i have never seen a moral victory train like this in my life. 

Edited by CPF4LIFE
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, travisura said:

Oh Frank get off it with the passive aggressive remarks. Stop being so miserable all the time and enjoy that the Panthers played well today. 

Hey now. I was. Read the posts I've made. I give credit where it is due. But then I enter some of these threads and apparently to some folks they feel like they are the arbiter of who can and can't be a fan because Bryce Young finally got close to replicating 35 year old Andy Dalton’s lone start 3 months later.

We can't have discussion about Young for different reasons. There are some fools that simply do not like him. But most just want him to be the player we drafted him to be. This superiority nonsense is just as toxic to discourse as the "haters" are. Jake Delhomme got the smoke. Cam Newton got the smoke. Kyle Allen got the smoke. Teddy Bridgewater got the smoke. Sam Darnold got the smoke. Baker Mayfield got the smoke. Why is Bryce any different? That comes with the territory of being the QB.

Again. Here's to hoping we can build on this and Bryce Young continues to develop and progress. Please no more steps back.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, frankw said:

Apparently it's unreasonable to expect your #1 pick to not be statistically one of the worst starting QB's in the NFL.

Some of you are so emotionally invested you've lowered standards and that's a personal preference.

I’m so tired of hearing this. It lacks all context. Anyone who has actually watched the games saw clear as day that yes, Bryce had issues but he was far from the biggest thing holding the team back. Some people like to say the QB is fully responsible for the offense and if that’s your angle then ok I guess this argument works, but I don’t subscribe to that and think it’s clear the context mattered. It isn’t a coincidence he has gotten better every week since Tabor took over. 
 

Your rookie QB who had a dated offensive scheme, statistically a top 5 bottom OL, and statistically least separation by a WR corp in the league struggled. What a revelation. 
 

Once we adapted our offensive scheme and added modern concepts the OL, WR, and QB have all looked better. What a revelation. 
 

it’s literally the opposite of being emotionally invested, it’s using your brain and seeing what is clear as day and backed up by the team stats 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...