Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interview requests

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Wolfcop said:

I heard him called a non-stoner Mike McDonald. Brilliant mind and very personable. I’m very intrigued. What he did to the Browns defense was impressive. 
 

That said, I don’t understand the lack of interest in Harbaugh, other than Tepper being an idiot. 

 

 

He is too much personality for Tepper. He isn’t puppet enough 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Who else have we not interviewed? Everyone that they said they would interview has interviewed. Unless you think we will add a name on Sat/Sun? Who would that be? Its clear Belichick, Harbaugh, and Vrabel have no interest in coming here or else we would have interviewed them already.

Ron Riveras 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wolfcop Grand Master

Wolfcop

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Wolfcop said:

I heard him called a non-stoner Mike McDonald. Brilliant mind and very personable. I’m very intrigued. What he did to the Browns defense was impressive. 
 

That said, I don’t understand the lack of interest in Harbaugh, other than Tepper being an idiot. 

 

 

I meant Mike McDaniel, not McDonald. Sorry 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leaky_Faucet Community Regular

Leaky_Faucet

Posted
Posted

Sorry guys wish I had something this time. Like I said Thursday, I figured they had because they had interviewed all the candidates at least once. 
 

Morgan is likely a strong possibility but that doesn’t mean they don’t bring in a President or Operations Director over him. What I know about the Panthers, I imagine the they have candidates they like for different roles. Meaning they have guys in the second round they like for Ops Director/GM and they probably have guys they like for AGM to replace Dan. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Martin said:

image.thumb.png.b8c6fae52d06315a1d2e304efadde282.png

"Hi Dan, welcome in. Ok, first question - explain to me the thought process behind trading 5 premium players for the biggest bust in NFL history".

 

I'm a Miami Hurricanes fan (a bigger one of those than I am a Carolina Panthers fan) and I have his Panthers jersey - if I'm saying he needs to leave and rebuild his career that's something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leaky_Faucet Community Regular

Leaky_Faucet

Posted
Posted (edited)

I wouldn’t be too discouraged about Morgan, even if they don’t hire anyone above him. Morgan had a successful career building until he was paired with Fitterer. Nobody really knows what opinions he brought to the table that Scott may have countered or overruled. I feel like he may have been right a lot considering how he wasn’t thrown out with Scott. 
 

I would trust Sportsology as well. They don’t have a lot of history in the NFL but the things they have dealt with has turned successful.

Edited by Leaky_Faucet
  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

"Hi Dan, welcome in. Ok, first question - explain to me the thought process behind trading 5 premium players for the biggest bust in NFL history".

 

I'm a Miami Hurricanes fan (a bigger one of those than I am a Carolina Panthers fan) and I have his Panthers jersey - if I'm saying he needs to leave and rebuild his career that's something. 

"yeah and walk me through how you thought this roster was better at every position but one"

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthercougar68 Grand Master

Panthercougar68

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Leaky_Faucet said:

I wouldn’t be too discouraged about Morgan, even if they don’t hire anyone above him. Morgan had a successful career building until he was paired with Fitterer. Nobody really knows what opinions he brought to the table that Scott may have countered or overruled. I feel like he may have been right a lot considering how he wasn’t thrown out with Scott. 
 

I would trust Sportsology as well. They don’t have a lot of history in the NFL but the things they have dealt with has turned successful.

People have revisionist history around here but Beane was not wanted because “he worked under Marty” and wanted the outside guy and now we stomp our feet because “we didn’t keep him”

That same situation with Morgan is playing in the back of my mind but people are forgetting that Dan was successfully scouting with the seahawks and bills well before he came to Charlotte under Scott. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

People have revisionist history around here but Beane was not wanted because “he worked under Marty” and wanted the outside guy and now we stomp our feet because “we didn’t keep him”

That same situation with Morgan is playing in the back of my mind but people are forgetting that Dan was successfully scouting with the seahawks and bills well before he came to Charlotte under Scott. 

So was he lying to our faces then when he said this roster was better than last year?

He's either disingenuous or incompetent. Neither are traits I want in someone working for the Panthers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...