Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Head Coach Preference as of January 12th


Evil Hurney
 Share

Head Coach Preference as of January 12th  

122 members have voted

  1. 1. Which head coaching option do you most prefer?

    • former Titans HC, Mike Vrabel
    • Bengals OC, Brian Callahan
    • Buccaneers OC, Dave Canales
    • Ravens OC, Todd Monken
    • Dolphins OC, Frank Smith
    • Panthers DC, Ejiro Evero
    • Ravens DC, Mike Macdonald
    • Other (leave name in comments)

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 01/15/2024 at 05:59 AM

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Vrabel, although I think that he may be good in theory, is 54-45. I don't know that he's the best option.

How do y'all know he isn't just going to be another Rivera or Fox?

If you look over the talent, he fought way above his weight class. Thats a rare trait these days. 

I mean Id non-stop run the ball with a prime henry too, could not care less what the insighters/podcasters said. 

Both Ive cooled on him, still want that young offense leadership. I guess frank smith is the pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

How can you exclude Harbaugh? C'mon', man.

He wasn't. I had him going to the Chargers (the team he's been most linked to).

IF Harbaugh stays at Michigan, I could see Vrabel being the consolation prize for the Chargers.

Edited by Evil Hurney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I feel Ben Jonson won't be attainable, I'll go with Frank Smith

 

Helped turn around a culture around in Miami as part of a record setting NFL offensive staff. He's also part of that McVay, Shanahan, Mcdaniel tree and I wants me some of that. Comes off a a leader and just read a poll that he was voted the most liked coordinator in the NFL as a cherry on top

 

And before any says he didn't call plays, neither did McDaniel in San Fran

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, nobody really excites me. I'm sure some of those guys would be good...maybe even great.

I just don't see us having any success for a while now matter who we get and, knowing our track record, the bar is set high for mediocre.

And I know if 8 let myself get excited about someone, they've been a disappointment.

So I'm just along for the ride. If we win, great. If we don't....well I'm used to it.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...