Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales Hire Temperature Gauge


Ricky Spanish
 Share

How do you feel about the Canales Hire?  

370 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you feel about the Canales Hire?

    • Love it!
      120
    • Hate it!
      28
    • Indifferent
      220


Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Why is Morgan the bigger issue? Experience? He and Canales worked together for years in Seattle. This hire was Morgan-led, so if your mindset is that Morgan is a puppet for Tepper ... so is Canales.

Lol...I am all in on Morgan and one of a few who  doesn't think he is a yes man.

He is the bigger issue because his role is more important right now leading up to the draft and free agency.There is no coaching going on so it's going to be a while before we can judge Canales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has produced at every stop. Im more concerned with good offense over flashy. Canales seems to be able to produce that. Playoff caliber offenses. Now can he create the right culture here and have buy in. Cannot have anothet softy like Rhule and Reich. This team needs an edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I'm excited we have a head coach again!  I'm interested in Canales.  I like what I've seen about him but there are plenty of questions that remain.

Hopefully Tepper gives him the time to develop and we get the right players in place.

Let's keep the off season moving.  We'll see how it goes.  Hopefully well!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bottom line---Russell Wilson was good with him and bad in Denver, Geno Smith was pulled from the dumpster and is good, Baker--you know the story there.  He is the coach hired so that Tepper can save face with the Bryce selection--so he hired the horse whisperer.  He was my second choice, behind Vrabel, but I am not into the tall grass about this stuff like some of you dateless data divers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nate Dogg said:

What do y’all think about this? Idk much about him at all. Why is he considered a good offensive mind? 

IMG_3925.jpeg

Look where they were at mid season. They were probably ranked 28th or lower across the board. They were sitting at 4-7 at one point before they figured out their running game. 

Why is he considered a good hire? See: Smith, Geno 2022 season and Mayfield, Baker 2023 season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No saying he mostly sucks is saying that he doesn’t suck the minority of the time.   Like if he took 17 tests and had a couple of really good showings and a handful of pretty good scores sprinkled in among the typical sub par results.   Like a golfer who went out and shot an 89.  There will be some real nice shots sprinkled in there but at the end of the day it is still 89.    
    • It's worth mentioning... Game 1: Oct 11 in Raleigh. 4-3 OT win with a complete starting lineup. Game 2: Dec 13 in Philly. 4-3 SO win without Jaccob Slavin. Game 3: Dec 14 in Raleigh. 3-2 SO win with a complete starting lineup. Game 4: Apr 13 in Philly. 3-2 SO loss with the AHL roster.  Those early season games were no indication of the Canes team that finished the season. Miller and Ehlers were still trying to figure things out, Nikishin was still a work in progress and the Stankoven line was just another line. Make no mistake, the Canes team Philly will see is nothing close to what they saw at any point in the season. If the top line starts producing, Freddie stays hot and the blue line does what it does, this could be a sweep as well.   
    • He is an employee of the team and speaking on the team's official channel. They arent critical of anything ever.
×
×
  • Create New...