Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Assistant Coach Chatter


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Potential offensive staff candidates under Canales:

OC: Brad Idzik

WRs/PGC: Sanjay Lal

RB: Chad Morton

TE: Pat McPherson

QB: ???

OL: Campen? 

 

I feel its time to move on from Campen

give that  offense a total fresh start  and a fresh look at those linemen 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, methodtoll said:

I cannot find where the original tweet but I saw on Twitter we are interviewing some guy from the Broncos for DC... Hope that doesn't mean Evero is out. 

maybe it was fake, im not seeing this anywhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

 

Very young and nearly no NFL experience, I hope he gets some gray hair on the offense staff. Feels too rhule-like, but everyone hires their friends....

I take it canales will be the play caller no matter the OC, maybe jim caldwell will fill the former HC role. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

Need to move on from Campen.

idk, it's really so weird he coached a great overall unit 2 years ago then we fell flat on our face this year with the same OTs and C (granted, G was a disaster due to injuries). I may consider giving him another shot in a non-Reich scheme. But mainly because I'm not really a fan of the other options out there. Maybe pull Scarnecchia out of retirement lol

Edited by t96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, t96 said:

idk, it's really so weird he coached a great overall unit 2 years ago then we fell flat on our face this year with the same OTs and C (granted, G was a disaster due to injuries). I may consider giving him another shot in a non-Reich scheme. But mainly because I'm not really a fan of the other options out there. Maybe pull Scarnecchia out of retirement lol

Calling it great is a bit of a stretch. These OL aren’t developing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Calling it great is a bit of a stretch. These OL aren’t developing.

I said same thing in twitter and Former panther OL, Mike Wahle responded to me.

he said OC/QB communication and scheme play a huge role in OL blitz pickup and stunt pickup.     He also said our scheme was almost all straight drop backs with little diversity and our OL struggles in straight pass pro (we know that)

He said that’s Campens specialty (I think Campen coached him in GB).   
 

Canales shuffled TB OL to match their players skill set.  And called plays to match their strength.   
 

hope same happens here.   Rhules scheme played against our OL strengths.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
    • I guess you missed the point. His rushing attack was dead last yet his team still performed. That’s not Fox/Rivera ball. His QB also had a career year. Remember the same QB that played for us in the same division and was so bad he was cut?  Carroll coached after Lynch as well. In fact Canales was more involved in the more recent offense with Geno Smith and a good rushing attack. People are taking him wanting a rushing attack and assuming that means we are shutting down our passing attack. Again many of the top offenses like SF, Miami, and Detroit featured strong rushing attacks. 
    • Too bad it was all for nothing because his dumbass goalie can't stay on his feet or control the puck when it's right infront of him 
×
×
  • Create New...