Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Introductory Press Conference


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

I agree, but i dont believe his scheme is very aggressive in general.  I wasnt just talking about last year.

Both this year and thr year before with the broncos, he. Was dealing with depleted defenses missing major starters whom absolutely impact the defense, and the ability to be aggressive. 

You haven't seen enough of him with a healthy defense to say ANTHING DEFINITIVE about how he would normally call a defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Byrdman4real said:

Means we need fast ass WRs

Not necessarily, I'm sure Chark runs a faster 40 compared to Theilan, but Theilan has more separation than Chark according to a chart in another post. Sometimes technique and route running are way more important than running in a straight line. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Nope and I have nothing to do with his show or their station. It's just short content which I think is better than posts whining about Young.

I absolutely enjoy this show. It’s better than anything in the Charlotte market. Thank you for posting these. I actually called in to the show the day the hire was announced. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

I got all fired up at first, and then I realized I did the same for Reich and Rhule. Let’s see it on the field on sundays this time please. 

It’s ok to be be fired up, Lobo. I do think Canales will be successful. The question is, “how long will it take?”

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

Dan going hard right there talking about how we need players that are passionate about football and inflict pain on the opponent and how we havent had enough of those players in recent history.

Yep. Horn about to be traded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, thunderraiden said:

Yep, saw one mock where we traded back at 33 for 2nd round picks and thought that was great too. If there is a giant batch of WR's available (which almost every mock shows in R2) gamble and try and get two of them. Or get OL and WR.

This. One thing I’ve come to realize about the draft is, after the top 15-20 picks, It’s more about finding the right players to fit what you do. Look at the Rams this year, after trading away all of their top picks a few years back. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jtm said:

No, that's not what I'm saying.  I think we need a longer track record of being a good dude than 2 years because it appears he was still being a bad dude while he was in Seattle, which was 2 years ago.  It is not like he interviewed to run a local business, the Panthers are a huge, worldwide company.  

I'm a father with two kids and I can't imagine doing what he did and then writing a book about it.  His kids will have to deal with that book for the rest of their lives and don't deserve that.  He's a public figure and it is not like you and I writing a book that no one will read.  It is selfish behavior and I don't like it.  I know it is sports and no one will care as long as he wins.  

Is publishing a book where you publicize your lowest points in life for people like you to freely judge and scrutinize, “selfish behavior”? It seems like he’d have more to lose than to gain from that, and going directly against your self-interests seems quite contrary to “selfish behavior”.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Going to be Sunday afternoon again which sucks.
    • The Panthers Huddle is usually just propaganda …this one was actually good im feeling good about the Morgan and Canales marriage  the proof is ‘in the pudding’ however  …and have to remember a first time head coach and players who have never played together before but they can’t possibly be worse than last year  the wild card to all this,  too,  is Young  I wish I felt better about him but I don’t  Morgan says he wants ‘dawgs’ not ‘dogs’ I.e. pit bulls vs poodles…I see young as the latter, not the former  Regardless, life is full of surprises…maybe he is a lot more than I see.  I’m not a scout or coach 
    • There are a lot of moving parts to this type of questions and way too many variables to consider to really predict how the outcome would have been any different in 2023 with Dalton starting more than just one game.  But instead of focusing on that Seattle game, another game, and the game following it, are more intriguing to me.   Week 16 vs Green Bay.  Young had the best game of his rookie season.  23/36 (64%) for 312 with 2 TD and no INT.  Thielen (6/94), Chark (6/98) and Tremble (4/59) all had huge plays in the passing game. The running game was a different story.  Hubbard (16/43) and Sanders (3/3) combined for just 46 yards rushing.  Mays was starting at LG and Jensen at RG.  The offensive line was able to protect Young just enough to keep the Panthers in the game until the very end.  But this wasn't because they were playing at a high level, rather the Packers defense played horrible this game. But this horrible defensive effort by the Packers allowed us to see what could be possible if Young had time to process and throw. Fast forward to Week 17 vs Jacksonville.  The offense was shut out and the offensive line allowed 6 sacks and 8 more QH's.   If you go back and watch these games back to back, the line play if very noticeable.  When Young had time in process and move, he was spot on.  When the line collapsed, like most QBs, he was ineffective. When you draft a QB 1st overall in the draft, especially if you trade up to do so, you hope to get a QB that can make plays despite the struggles around him.  Think Newton his rookie year.  Should the Panthers have traded up in the 2023 draft to the 1st overall and should they have drafted Young at that spot? My opinion is no to the first question and no QB in 2023 was worth trading up to take in the top 10.  Neither Stroud, Richardson or Levis would have been worth it.   But none of them would have fared any better than Young either with the Panthers, in my opinion.  Stroud had a good season in Houston but he didn't have a Cam Newton or Lamar Jackson season.  He needed slightly above average talent in one of the worst divisions to make the playoffs. He had the season we were hoping for in Carolina but wasn't going to get with Young or Stroud. Now, I'm not trying to put Young up on a pedestal here.  There are a lot of questions that still surround him and his ability to be QB1 on the Panthers in the future.  But the issue last year wasn't just the play at the QB position.  And really, I don't think the WR issues were as much as people make them out to be.  The real issue on this offense was the line and the running game.  If your line can't get a push to run the ball or pass block to pass the ball, you have no offense.   Start Young. Start Dalton.  Draft Stroud, Richardson or Levis.  Kidnap Mahomes.  Doesn't matter, I think the end result would have been the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...