Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josina Anderson thoughts on the Burns situation


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It's about time they stop rewarding mediocre players for mediocre effort.  Screw the moral in the building. Those guys have been one of the worst, and now the worst team the in the league. Its not all on the coaches as to why they suck. If they don't like it it gtfo. We've had too much of that attitude in the building for too long.

Agree. Reward the guys like Brown and Luvu and set the tone for expecting toughness 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 33inNC said:

Maybe Burns should have not expected such a high amount. I am all for paying what players are worth, but some get greedy and price themselves out. 

Our front office are the ones who set his value so high by turning down 2 1sts and a 2nd for him. That's Bosa level trade value. I don't blame him at all for getting what he can. The Panthers chose to be in this position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Oh there is no question about the loss. If we sign him for what he wants, it's a loss. If we sign him for what we offered, it's a loss. If we trade him for less than what the Rams offered, it's a loss. If he walks away for merely a compesetory pick, it's a loss.

The instant we turned that offer down, we lost. The only thing that needed to be answered was by how much.

It’s still amazing to me how many people in here couldn’t see how ridiculously good that offer was when you added the three picks plus the ability to sign two $15M a year FAs for Burns. At least those of us who understood the full value have been exonerated but it still sucks because being right meant our idiot GM was proven wrong yet again.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed with what another posted. Let the players see how we handle business. Extend Brown and Luvu and they will get the message. I’m all for keeping him at 23-24mil I just don’t think it will happen. How can we say this guy deserves more than Crosby? I was one who wanted to pay him 27-28 last off season scared of him balling out in Evero’s defense but didn’t happen. Now not sure if he’s worth that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Our front office are the ones who set his value so high by turning down 2 1sts and a 2nd for him. That's Bosa level trade value. I don't blame him at all for getting what he can. The Panthers chose to be in this position.

That doesn't actually set his value though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ncfan said:

https://x.com/josinaanderson/status/1760433355529621578?s=46
 

wont let it embed it from my phone.  So if someone wants to add it.

but this part makes me nervous.

Can only imagine what Brown and his agent are thinking watching this

IMG_7621.jpeg

Well, if everyone is watching it sounds like an easy call….

go pay and sign Brown and Luvu first and foremost.  Go lock up what has been our best players on the D.   Seems like players here are far would respect that. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Lobo said:

By not accepting the rams trade this team made their decision. Now if they trade him for less than what the rams offered, that’s a big fat L. They have to reach an agreement some way, although I think paying him 30 mil is too much. His production does not match that. If he gets it, good for him, get the bag. 

The only L would be signing him to a long term deal. As long as Burns is not on the roster by TC its a huge win for the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

It’s still amazing to me how many people in here couldn’t see how ridiculously good that offer was when you added the three picks plus the ability to sign two $15M a year FAs for Burns. At least those of us who understood the full value have been exonerated but it still sucks because being right meant our idiot GM was proven wrong yet again.

Or we could have afforded to keep cmc and Moore.  Burns would have had essentially 0 dead cap hit. We paid the best running back in football 30 million dollars to not play for us anymore. That trade was unbelievably stupid looking back at it. The value was just ok and we still had to eat all that money so we couldn't use it on other players. Even if we didn't completely poo the bed on the picks it was still dumb as hell 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, App Panther said:

As I kept reading it, I literally thought this was a planted story. 

It's clearly what it is.

His agent saw all the talk on twitter about the athletic article and wanted to put public pressure back on the Panthers instead of his client.  So he paid her to write a story.

 

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the available options and the current situation I think we end up using the non-exclusive tag.  That way if he thinks he is worth $30M he can go get that from someone else and we still get 2 first round picks in compensation if he does.....or else he accepts the tag and we continue a lower trade or lower contract.  This is exactly the purpose of the Non-exclusive.

But on Burns - the $27M is easily fair considering his production and age - yes he would be 2nd highest, but not long as the market always adjusts.  It is high enough to be fair but low enough to be where he is valued for the next 3-4 years.  If he can't see that then the problem is him.  I'm a fan of transparency - the locker room only needs to know that you are working with him professionally and the 2 sides disagree - details aren't required.  If Burns of the others want to spread details that is on them - if it gets detrimental that is on them and you need to move on from them.  But the Front Office just  needs to be fair and consistent....not held hostage by immature young adults.  That is how we ended up in this mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tanking in the NFL isn’t really a thing and anybody wanting to bring the rigged lottery to the NFL has an ulterior motive.
    • I understand where you're coming from, but we need another safety IMHO. Other positions, especially on defense, dont have ideal depth, but to me at least S is the one position we can't stand pat at even when thinking about the future
    • 100%. Nick Scott was awful last year. Like, even for a franchise that hasn't historically invested in that position, it stood out for how awful it was. If he sees meaningful snaps at S again we're cooked.  Maybe he has value for ST, but I certainly hope we can upgrade. Jordan Fuller, who was by all accounts an Evero guy, was almost as bad. Xavier Woods was bad, but not complete garbage. Still did not want him back. Those 3 guys seriously may have been the worst S group in the NFL. And they all were brought in, especially Fuller, as good fits for this system. Everyone knocks the defensive line, and they deserve a lot of blame, too, but so, so many times our safeties inability to tackle let 4-5 yard runs turn into 10+. And it happened over and over and over again if you watch the film. Honestly, Demani Richardson was the only S by the end of the year I remember making positive plays. I have no issue with Richardson being in the mix and/or competing to be a starter, but we still need another S desperately IMHO who has actually played meaningful snaps in the NFL. The only caveat/excuse for our secondary was the fact our pass rush was nonexistent for large stretches last year. Maybe that helps with coverage, but I dont see how that makes any of these guys better at tackling.  I know it somewhat feels like piling on at this point, but I feel 100% confident in saying this was the worst tackling team in franchise history. The 70ish yard pass play we gave up to Jamarr Chase where he ran through and past everyone in the secondary has to be up there in terms of most embarrassing plays I've ever seen. I can't imagine how embarrassed Kuechly must have been watching from the booth... I think bringing back Evero was a mistake, but for a team that has had nothing but change over the past 5 years, I'm willing to see this through. I definitely think we added significantly to the floor of this defense with the additions we made. I dont think Evero has any further excuses if he cant field a unit that can at least somewhat hold their own. Fixing the safety play is going to be a big part of that.
×
×
  • Create New...