Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Division Talk: Falcons are heavy favorites to land Justin Fields


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Fields is destined for Vegas or a sleeper team. ATL and PIT aren’t happening. 

I think the actual interest in Fields is going to be very low until after free agency and maybe the draft. That is when you will see teams that didn't position themselves as well as they had hoped start to get desperate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fields is definitely one amazing runner and could be a great threat if he would just improve his passing skills. After this much time I doubt it happens but I do think he is better than Ridder and would definitely be an upgrade. Not for any break the bank deal though as I just dont think Fields has proven to be some top QB worthy of top QB money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I would take Fields honestly if we could get him for a 4th.

 

Again it will never happen because we are set on making Bryce work.

I don't know if we're set on making Bryce work, but we're definitely set on giving him a fair shot this season with a new staff and (hopefully) upgraded roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Why rule out Pitt?  I think they could make it work if Tomlin wanted to.  Slash 2.0

I wouldn't rule him out, but the Steelers don't historically give up draft capital, much less before the draft has even started. The franchise is very conservative. That being said, I've heard that Fields is likely not going to have the market that he would like, and that the Bears are not going to get the compensation that they would like. If Chicago doesn't make a move before free agency, Fields may lose out in that QB game of musical chairs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, travisura said:

Ben Solak from The Ringer made the case for the Browns to trade for him, cutting bait from Deshaun.

Watson is a far better player than Fields. That makes little sense. If you want to bench Watson, just keep Flacco until Watson becomes cheap enough to cut.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CRA said:

Why rule out Pitt?  I think they could make it work if Tomlin wanted to.  Slash 2.0

Combination of their historical MO, Tomlin, Arthur Smith's preferences, and the rumors they want to give Pickett one more shot.  

I think that's who signs Tannehill as in-season insurance to Pickett and they'll end up in the QB hunt (maybe with us) come 2025.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Fields is destined for Vegas or a sleeper team. ATL and PIT aren’t happening. 

Why don't you think PIT?  I saw where Tomlin was high on him and that Arthur Smith offense would work with him as QB.  

-never mind you answered this already.

Edited by ForJimmy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...