Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ian Thomas getting Restructure


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

How does this guy keep surviving multiple regime changes?? Hes gotta have some dirt on Tepper lol

There's no other fuggin way. We can release solid depth on the o-line (Bozeman) but can't do away with a dude that has 4 TDs through SIX seasons?!

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has to be his blocking. HAS TO! Dude is horrible in the passing game.  One thing is for certain, after Hurst failing to restructure and most likely Bozeman, people are looking at modifying their contracts a bit differently now.  Morgan is telling these dudes they are not playing up to their contract so they can take a cut and keep their job or not and go sit on the couch for a while longer.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It has to be his blocking. HAS TO! Dude is horrible in the passing game.  One thing is for certain, after Hurst failing to restructure and most likely Bozeman, people are looking at modifying their contracts a bit differently now.  Morgan is telling these dudes they are not playing up to their contract so they can take a cut and keep their job or not and go sit on the couch for a while longer.

Yup. Guessing Ian chose the pay cut over finding out if anyone else would give him more than vet min in FA.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It has to be his blocking. HAS TO! Dude is horrible in the passing game.  One thing is for certain, after Hurst failing to restructure and most likely Bozeman, people are looking at modifying their contracts a bit differently now.  Morgan is telling these dudes they are not playing up to their contract so they can take a cut and keep their job or not and go sit on the couch for a while longer.

is he taking a cut or renegotiating the terms moving money to the back end? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

cut bozeman but keep thomas

 

Way too early to grade morgan but damn..........

I love the no BS attitude he's taking towards these underachieving players.  It's refreshing for a Panthers GM to hold them accountable.  It's the back fill I'm concerned about and how it's going to be a near impossible task.  The reason I feel more and more that this will be a full rebuild (see tank) season.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ehh, new front office has 2 drafts under their belt -- Salaun draft class was really a horrible class in general, but Salaun has started to show some of his potential and KJ Simpson not bad for a 2nd round pick. This past draft clearly looks like it was knocked out of the fuging park obviously with Kon but also Sion and Kalk already contributing in somewhat big roles for late round picks. And McNeeley has shown potential and lit it up in summer league, seems to be doing well in the G league for a young guy too.      As for this season I think a very realistic goal and outcome of the regular season is sneaking up into a 7 or 8 seed and then winning 1 of 2 play-in games to make the real playoffs. Probably get cooked in round 1 but that playoff experience and establishing that expectation of winning is critical to the development of our young core. 
    • Sound write-up MHS, as always.  Agree that the smart move that forward thinking franchises make would be drafting a tackle early, if not for sure in R1, depending on who's there. Based on early predictions we're choosing between Fano and Proctor. No brainer here...Fano all day. Proctor does not move the needle for me. In my mind, Icky has less future here than Brooks does. I love Icky, but he has been average as a top-10 pick, one good year where you saw the potential...and that was this year. He's built like a RT and his strengths are there, but he's always played left. I also feel like part of what has held him back from being elite, was his work ethic. He was known for it coming out, but feel like he fell right at home in Carolina and maybe didn't push himself as hard as he needed to. Throw in a major crucial injury that will take time to recover and a historical low return rate to current form, and the outlook is not great. Fano can play both sides and we need to also plan for Moton's departure. Either way, delaying drafting a tackle early this year will hurt us down the line. Our current OL is overpriced and needs to start adding draftees to start balancing out the inevitable changes coming in the next 2-3 years.  As others have said, maybe Icky can replace Hunt or Lewis in a couple years when he's fully recovered....IDK. Also not a guarantee, but then you have to figure out his contract and it becomes even more clouded.
    • It's past time to just eliminate it in terms of an event. Just do the voting, name the roster, and move on. When you get down to 6th and 7th alternates it's just absurd. It doesn't mean anything.
×
×
  • Create New...