Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stop Crying about Burns


Biggdaddi1022
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I'm not mad Burns is gone or his enormous new contract.  I'm upset about the compensation.  Fug Scott Fitterer. 

Bingo. Two 2nds should've been the absolute bare minimum and honestly I would've held out for their '25 1st though Morgan would've probably taken the two 2nds instead knowing Tepper might rage fire him three weeks into the season anyway.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

The only win type trade for this fanbase was going to be a 1st & late rounders. 

The reactions are expected, and the slight but not total let down in returns is as well.  

I was willing to take a 1st and....  I realized the two 1sts ship had sailed, I wasn't delusional. But a fuggin' 2nd and 5th????

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Biggdaddi1022 said:

If we gave him 150 million you would have been mad so they did the best thing could do since it wasn’t working . Plus Morgan wasn’t the one who made the choice to keep burns instead of trading him to The rams…. Not much you can do If a player hurt their value but you make countless attempts to work out a deal and they just want more than you are willing to pay….. I hated to see him go but it was needed if he wouldn’t sign a contract with us for a reasonable amount instead of being hell bent on 30 million a year ..No matter what the panthers do y’all will never be happy.

My man we are the worst team in football with the worst owner in football. What the hell are we supposed to be happy about?

 

Stop flooding this place with inspirational post. We suck get it through your thick jello brain.

 

#WeHopeTepperSellsTheTeam

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I enjoy being truthful. Although that means being unbiased. Which most on here are incapable of being unbiased. 
    • It looks like the Bucks and Giannis are headed for a divorce. He says he's ready to play and the Bucks say that he has told them he isn't. It really doesn't matter except that it likely means the end for Giannis in Milwaukee. He's 31 years old, but still an elite producer.  So, as GM, would you go after him this offseason? Remember, the Hornets have two 1st round picks this year and potentially THREE first round picks next year. What would a trade look like?
    • I agree with you, if all things are equal--assuming we are on the same page as to what that means.  If a DT and OT are there at 19 and you have them equal, which do you take? The DT would be rotational and get 25 snaps a game or so, and the OT is probably a reserve for most of the season.  What if Walker plays out of his mind and Ickey comes back strong? To me, there are just too many variables at T and Morgan met the needs for 2 starters.  Nothing about that screams lets "go OT in round 1" to me. I could see an Edge or a DT at 19 before I see OT.  I could see a TE or S before an OT--and I (personally) would rather have an OT over DT, Edge, TE, or S--but I do not see the logic.  In fact, CB is a position that resembles OT--who do we have behind our starters and are we happy with Smith-Wade?  A CB would be on the field more than a reserve OT.  How is the Walker at LT situation different than the the Bryce situation? He is basically on a 1-year deal and if he is injured, Forsythe becomes Pickett.  Would you take Simpson in the draft?  Dont get me wrong--I usually agree with you  and I get your point.  I am an OL guru--but I just do not see this particular group of Tackles making us better than Walker.  In addition, I think we can address OT once the Ickey situation clears up.  Short arms, poor run blocking, issues with strength--I am simply not impressed with the OTs.  For clarity, "developmental" refers to players who are still a year or two away from starting.  We are all developmental, but there are prospects who need a season to transition to the pro game. I see 1--maybe 2 OTs who could step into a starting role right now. In college, for example, taking snaps under center requires a different approach than blocking for the shotgun.  There is less to learn if you play a position that does not require much adjustment to transition to the NFL.
×
×
  • Create New...