Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jonathan Jones: NO conversations between Panthers and Bengals for Higgins


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

When the draft is LOADED at WR, why trade draft capital and pay $80m for him?  I was not sure how I felt about it, but I am relieved, honestly.

 

Pick #33 is very valuable.  There are about 18 hours between picks 32 and 33, and a team has that long to present a package to move up.  Many teams will have players on the board that fell to 33, and some will attempt to move up to grab that player at 33--we are in a position to get our guy at 39 have a mid second round pick, and an additional third rounder.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

When the draft is LOADED at WR, why trade draft capital and pay $80m for him?  I was not sure how I felt about it, but I am relieved, honestly.

 

Pick #33 is very valuable.  There are about 18 hours between picks 32 and 33, and a team has that long to present a package to move up.  Many teams will have players on the board that fell to 33, and some will attempt to move up to grab that player at 33--we are in a position to get our guy at 39 have a mid second round pick, and an additional third rounder.

 

I would be stunned if morgan doesnt trade down from 33.  Especially if a qb like pennix falls

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Captroop said:

Captroop and Sydney Sweeney!!!

 

There has been some talk, mainly by Captroop himself, about Sydney Sweeney being a total smokeshow. This has led some to make dubious connections between the Huddle's cat poop, and arguably the most marketable actress in Hollywood at the moment.

Sources say that Captroop has never actually talked to Sydney Sweeney, has no ability to do so, is married, and his wife is vehemently against the idea of polyamory.

 

So yeah. Pretty much no connection or anything worth reporting. Carry on.

Nope. She is not.  She has a cavity in one of her molars and her taste in fashion is questionable.  Her eyes are not 100% horizontally parallel--and that is a deal breaker for me. 

Untitled.jpg.0151a1447383d9bf85802bf30171ea12.jpg

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you pay massive money to to OGs and then proceed to trade high draft picks and pay even more massive money to a WR seeking a huge deal 🤔 

We're supposed to be rebuilding.  Putting us in cap hell for the next 4 years for a WR isn't smart imo. Rebuild the team through the draft.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Captroop said:

Captroop and Sydney Sweeney!!!

 

There has been some talk, mainly by Captroop himself, about Sydney Sweeney being a total smokeshow. This has led some to make dubious connections between the Huddle's cat poop, and arguably the most marketable actress in Hollywood at the moment.

Sources say that Captroop has never actually talked to Sydney Sweeney, has no ability to do so, is married, and his wife is vehemently against the idea of polyamory.

 

So yeah. Pretty much no connection or anything worth reporting. Carry on.

I like the cut of your jib. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stingray3030 said:

I would LOVE to have Tee Higgins - but trading those 2 picks is the wrong choice.  I don't see Tee on our radar any longer....we have nothing to offer without Burns.

Those two high 2nd round picks give you a chance to start the rebuild after a disastrous few years. 

They shouldn't be traded for anything short of Patrick Mahomes. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

fug it. We've already gutted the D. Just go all in at this point. I want no more Bryce excuses.

They are gonna get this thing so stacked ands simple a high schooler could run it, it’ll probably make Young look just appetizing enough that they don’t change horses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...