Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Rizzuti's realistic Panthers 7-round mock draft


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Pick No. 33 (Second round): Kool-Aid McKinstry, CB, Alabama 

Pick No. 39 (Second round): Keon Coleman, WR, Florida State

Pick No. 65 (Third round): Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M

Pick No. 101 (Fourth round): Beaux Limmer, C, Arkansas

Pick No. 141 (Fifth round): Braelon Allen, RB, Wisconsin

Pick No. 142 (Fifth round): Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State

Pick No. 240 (Seventh round): Hayden Hatten, WR, Idaho

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/lists/panthers-mock-draft-post-free-agency-kool-aid-mckinstry-keon-coleman/

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, I hope Dan Morgan doesn't think like that.  Hate that mock. 

I actually like Bell late there but that's all the nice things I got to say about that mock.  Don't like Kool-Aid or the FSU WRs and those 2nd rounders is going to be what has people liking or hating any mock. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

well, I hope Dan Morgan doesn't think like that.  Hate that mock. 

I actually like Bell late there but that's all the nice things I got to say about that mock.  Don't like Kool-Aid or the FSU WRs and those 2nd rounders is going to be what has people liking or hating any mock. 

Bell remains me of Deebo Samuel 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

What makes this any more realistic than any other mock draft? 

I will say that If McInstry is there, then he'd have a good chance of being picked by us, but I don't know that he's going to last until day 2. 

I think it's called a "realistic" draft because that looks like some horrific draft haul Rhule or Fitterer would end up with and nothing has changed in the scouting department.

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kool Aid could be a draft faller.  Remember, he had a better CB playing across from him, so he was matched up on the #2 wr a lot--it seems.  I think the draft is deep at CB and if you take one at 33, you are missing out on a player of greater need.

However, I could be wrong--I was once wrong about a draft pick or two--but it was way back in 2023.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...