Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Select Trevin Wallace LB - Pick 72, Round 3


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

awkward d&d GIF by Hyper RPG

I wanted Mitchell and Leggette.  Said it for weeks.  In the end, we could have had Leggette and Mitchell.   

now the ghost of Marty Hurney inspired Morgan 

I wasn’t going to be happy without some variation of 2 WRs over the course of Thurs and Fri. 

Oh well…at least I like the first pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, App Panther said:

Can't wait to watch Wilson have 110 tackles on a yearly basis while we debate if Wallace can be cut in Year 3 to sign some Vet LB. 

Remember when we passed on that OG that went to the Cheifs, that balled out even tho he had heart issues or something. Trey Smith?

At some point you gotta take some swings. Hell the rb we drafted just tore his fuging ACL last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ricky Spanish said:

I don't know enough about him to have an opinion.

But a RB and a LB in the 2nd and 3rd are not positional reaches. They are reaches in the 1st.

He was not great in college at all. Purely another RAS pick, just like DJ Johnson last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This LB class is pretty weak, Mich LB and Kentucky LB, to me, were the best pure LBs in the class. As much as I like Gray and Wilson, they just weren’t close to those two. Wilson was getting tackles 10 yards down the field and get get off blocks. I’m sure I’m missing other pure LBs but Wallace is tough. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I don't know enough about him to have an opinion.

But a RB and a LB in the 2nd and 3rd are not positional reaches. They are reaches in the 1st.

They aren’t the offensive skill players I think this draft put on the table for us to walk away with.  So that’s just my beef.  It was gong to have to be that for me to thumbs up it.  

Thought  from the jump you could have landed 2 stud WRs by tonight and a RB tomorrow that could all see the field and improve our O.  I’m in record not giving a rip about the D until we get the offense on the right path 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I wanted Mitchell and Leggette.  Said it for weeks.  In the end, we could have had Leggette and Mitchell.   

now the ghost of Marty Hurney inspired Morgan 

I wasn’t going to be happy without some variation of 2 WRs over the course of Thurs and Fri. 

Oh well…at least I like the first pick

AD and XL seem redundant to me. I preferred AD but when we drafted XL I kind of assumed AD was a no go. We would need a shifty route runner or deep threat speedster if we add another WR IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a lot of you guys think we can do no wrong, we are shiitttt I've been watching since 95' This team is a walking turd. I'll be there with you til I die but don't let a udfa make you believe we should have taken him top of the third. Pound your meat!

Edited by SmittysLawnGuy
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...