Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jets footage on the trade back from 65


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

Cool video. Would watch one for each of our trades heh. With that said, I kinda wish we hadn’t made that trade. I forget who it was but someone went between 65 and 72 I had wanted. Frazier or Colson, someone like that. 
 

Edit: it was Colson, went 69

Edited by JawnyBlaze
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, countryboi said:

I enjoy taking a peek behind the curtain, its nice to see us not looking a mess for once

I think it was the Vikings when we drafted Jordan Gross that didn't get the card to the stage (they did it differently then) before the clock expired and the Panthers rushed their card to the commissioner ahead of them.  I think the Panthers had the 9th overall pick, and they drafted Gross 8th overall.  I think that happened to the Vikings again the following year--now, it could have been strategic (knowing they would get their player at a lower salary), but it was odd.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I think it was the Vikings when we drafted Jordan Gross that didn't get the card to the stage (they did it differently then) before the clock expired and the Panthers rushed their card to the commissioner ahead of them.  I think the Panthers had the 9th overall pick, and they drafted Gross 8th overall.  I think that happened to the Vikings again the following year--now, it could have been strategic (knowing they would get their player at a lower salary), but it was odd.

From what I remember it was strategic to lower cap costs since that was pre rookie salary cap. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes I to account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as a treading water year. I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. 
    • What happened to King? Was he a no show?
    • think these smaller Qb's are going to have a much harder time convincing an NFL team to draft them. not saying a smaller Qb under 6 feet tall will not make an NFL roster .it will most likely be a UDFA contract more or less prove it deal.NFL teams have been burnt time & time again investing in these small NFL Qbs & i think  teams are now finally starting to realize that investing in these smaller Qb's under 6 feet tall is simply a bad idea  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...