Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Jacabee said:

It was both literally and figuratively a parade of horribles.

1)  Glut of coaching “talent” with designs that didn’t match the personnel and didn’t mesh with each other.


2) An o-line  I’ll-fitted for the scheme on the interior. Injuries compounded this critical weakness. Penetration on runs completely negated whatever zone dominance we tried to establish. 

3) Lack of separation by the WR’s. A lack of speed and separation and filling the right roles led to some pretty embarrassing looks. We couldn’t win on multiple levels

and it repeatedly trickled

down. Also look to (2) because interior pass rush often limited the time for routes to develop.

4) Rookie qb with an average arm but degenerative mechanics. Those railing about arm strength are off. He can sling it with a solid base, and the time of release is plus.

5) as the season wore on, we saw more bailing on the pocket, more dancing, more tip

toes . Which isn’t that weird given (1)-(3). 
 

Finally, CJ had one of the best seasons ever for a rookie qb and we missed the pick. It has no bearing whatsoever on whether Bryce Young can be a successful NFL QB.

I’ll say this: if the kid does rebound and proves himself, that’s the gamer you want leading your team. 

Solid review 💯...the huddle needs more of this! 🍺 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i am anxious to see what he does with this new situation. i think the schedule is about as favorable as you could hope for the first half of the year. i don't expect a dramatic and quick  improvement, but i do expect improvement.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just about to post this. Great video and it's not too long

+ Some nice throws, especially in the intermediate middle of the field 

+ Ability to extend plays

+ Better than you'd think at scrambling/running

 

- Poor deep ball arm strength, especially while under pressure

- Lot of inaccurate throws otherwise especially outbreaking routes Bryce would commonly overthrow WRs down the field on/near the hashes

- His short stature affects his ball trajectory/field vision when defensive players get close to Bryce and see him loading up to throw 

- Bad at escaping pressure/sacks

- Needs to get better with turnovers/decision making 

 

> Mingo lost a ton of potential yards while open, because Bryce threw him a Ton of uncatchable balls  

> Bryces WRs were near the bottom of the league in WR separation metrics 

> O line was horrendous and played a big role 

 

Screenshot_20240517_085949_YouTube.jpg

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He probably can't improve his arm strength for throwing over pressure, the video creator  mentioned bryces inability to throw over pressure multiple times. That kinda stuck out to me.

If his ideal comp is like a Tua 2.0 then they're definitely gonna have to get some really good players around him. And you better hope Canales is the next coming of Mike McDaniels 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hoenheim said:

And you better hope Canales is the next coming of Mike McDaniels 

Honestly, irrespective of Bryce, this is my hope for Canales.

I hate hearing about him being a "QB whisperer." Because I don't give a rat's ass about him saving Bryce's career. Bryce either proves to be worth what we gave up for him, or it's next man up.

I'm just excited to have a young, innovative offensive mind.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Captroop said:

Honestly, irrespective of Bryce, this is my hope for Canales.

I hate hearing about him being a "QB whisperer." Because I don't give a rat's ass about him saving Bryce's career. Bryce either proves to be worth what we gave up for him, or it's next man up.

I'm just excited to have a young, innovative offensive mind.

How did this “innovative” narrative start with Canales? Just because he’s young?

He truly wants to run the ball and nothing Tampa did last year was all that creative. Mike Evans ability to win 1 on 1 does wonders for an offense as a whole 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did they mention anything about some players and most every coach not giving a flying fug and seemingly just going through the motions. So many of our players and coaches needed to shown the door last season and glad many were. I expect to definitely see improvement from Bryce this season and hoping this is the case. New coach appears to actually give a fug and we got rid of some of our "I was going through the motions and playing to not get injured" guys like Brian Burns who was like dead weight. Ridding ourselves of that dead weight didnt give tow shits coach Frank Reich should really help as well as hoping for a much better O-Line and receivers that can get open with an entire different scheme that doe snot look like a middle school offense.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

How did this “innovative” narrative start with Canales? Just because he’s young?

He truly wants to run the ball and nothing Tampa did last year was all that creative. Mike Evans ability to win 1 on 1 does wonders for an offense as a whole 

He's hot

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...