Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CBS does not think Bryce makes the leap


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

2023 offensive staff was full actual of NFL guys.   So who wasn't very nice?  Probably all of them.  Asst HC Duce, QB Coach McCown, OC Brown, WR Jefferson,  OL Campen, HC Frank, etc.  All former players.  NFL guys. 

New staff is lighter on actual NFL guys.  HC didn't play.  OC didn't play.  QB coach didn't play.  Asst HC/RB didn't play.  OL didn't play. 

So I could see this O staff having a very different approach and not being as hard on dudes. 

Not saying one way yields better results than the other.  But I could totally see guys that have done it being tougher verbally. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Stingray3030 said:

For instance:

We spent a ton of money on 2 of the best Guards available, we cut our starting Center at great expense, we traded for a WR, we spent 3 of our top 4 draft picks on offensive weapons, spent time so far at OTA's working on Bryce's footwork, and our coaches and owner have all expressed 100% support for our QB while stating a gameplan to play to his STRENGTHS

We DIDN'T upgrade our backup QB, draft a mid to late round QB, trade for or sign R or Z Wilson, Tannehill, Fields, Jones, Darnold, or Garoppolo

These are all FACTS - not media statements or opinions - and these facts point to our coaching staff, who are more qualified than any Media outlet, believe Bryce is capable of moving forward.  If you want to know what to believe, that is the most reliable information available.  Not these Media takes.

Even so that is not a long term thing unless Young makes it so. It only tells you so much.

It could just as simply be that they were hired under conditions that he be given every opportunity to keep and grow into the job. That will be revisited after the season... or something along those lines. 

We just don’t know.

I know some of you think Young is a star, so you would, but I wonder how many qualified guys would sign on being married to winning with him. There has to be an out. It makes sense that the new guy will do his best with what’s here (first) rather than just can it given the situation.  

edit: as far as NFL coaching  and played and having not played, those vets who are coaching are known for being vet friendly.

Canales has said some things that hint he is a coddler, but I feel like he can be pretty cold blooded. No proof just a feeling. Or maybe Morgan will need to be bad cop. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, strato said:

Even so that is not a long term thing unless Young makes it so. It only tells you so much.

It could just as simply be that they were hired under conditions that he be given every opportunity to keep and grow into the job. That will be revisited after the season... or something along those lines. 

We just don’t know.

I know some of you think Young is a star, so you would, but I wonder how many qualified guys would sign on being married to winning with him. There has to be an out. It makes sense that the new guy will do his best with what’s here (first) rather than just can it given the situation.  

edit: as far as NFL coaching  and played and having not played, those vets who are coaching are known for being vet friendly.

Canales has said some things that hint he is a coddler, but I feel like he can be pretty cold blooded. No proof just a feeling. Or maybe Morgan will need to be bad cop. 

Respect....in my opinion the absolute, without a doubt, top of the list, most important thing in the world when it comes to the success of any sort of team.  No matter whether it is sports, a career, your family, friends, any sort of team on any level.  It is more important than details, plans, structure, authority, all of it....RESPECT.  But Respect has to be earned and can only be given to a small degree.  It is very easily lost and difficult to achieve.  Canales strikes me as the the kind of guy who understands that deeply and is working to earn that individually with each player.  I have seen hundreds of leaders go into new roles in different ways, but my limited view of how he is doing it is the most effective way for long term success in most environments.  Alot of people see this as coddling (not saying you are wrong at all) but there is a balance between hard stances and giving someone rope, and it is different for every individual what they need.  He might be a coddler too much - but so far he looks more like a Respectful Leader - rare these days and seems to be getting more scarce.  I hope I am right.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Do you think Bryce owns a panic room? How many safe spaces do you think he has? Kid was great in college but is simply too small for the NFL. Note I said small, not short. I agree with CBS. We'll be doing this all over again next Draft.

Never change Brooklyn 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Do you think Bryce owns a panic room? How many safe spaces do you think he has? Kid was great in college but is simply too small for the NFL. Note I said small, not short. I agree with CBS. We'll be doing this all over again next Draft.

CC on Twitter: "“Bryce young is too small to play qb” The Panthers ...

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Forgot the other tweet with the qb rankings

 

Panthers missed on Stroud but missing on Levis also hurts even more. They could have stayed put drafted Levis without trading away everything.  Stroud appears to be probowler every year but Levis showed major glimpses that he would be top ten fairly soon. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, fanpanther said:

Panthers missed on Stroud but missing on Levis also hurts even more. They could have stayed put drafted Levis without trading away everything.  Stroud appears to be probowler every year but Levis showed major glimpses that he would be top ten fairly soon. 

That was my preference, I hate using future years to get something now. No big trade ups. Couple spots, keep your future bullets, okay. 

It wasn’t about Levis it was more about the leveraging the future, and we could have traded back from 9 and got him. Still; have DJ. Etc etc.

And when we did trade up and taking a QB was the reality, okay now I need to look at these guys. I came out of it anybody but Young. Just didn’t think he translated. At least the other three have the physical tools that you want if you are going all in. 

 

Talking about his processor, you know some guy people said had the highest iQ ever worked odd jobs and as a bouncer, stuff like that. (Bryce and his processor won’t need to do that, but this NFL top 10 QB thing isn’t his calling) The whole package is what you need to find. 

 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

My order for the draft was this:

1. Stroud

2. Levis

3. Richardson

 

 

4. DTR

5. Bryce

The top three are three rounds better than DTR or Bryce. Just because someone else would’ve taken Bryce if we hadn’t doesn’t make them right either. 
 

I’ve also seen people comparing Bryce and Caleb Williams but Williams has something Bryce doesn’t, and that is speed, belief, swagger, and arm strength. I think Williams, Daniels, Maye, and Nix all have the chance to be better than everyone from 2023, including Stroud. Maybe not this year, but in their career. 
 

Now 2025 is a QB Desert unless you want someone like Cam Ward or Carson Beck, neither of which are ideal. 
 

I know I’d draft Joey Aguilar later in the draft. Dude has an NFL arm and RG3 confirmed as much after watching him throw in the monsoon that was the Cure Bowl. 

Milroe will be that guy IMO--especially with Penix's old coach. I just hope the Bryce experience isn't enough to sour everyone on Alabama QBs.

I mean, imagine if one reason Chicago didn't draft Stroud because they already had an Ohio State QB that they hated...

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

Milroe will be that guy IMO--especially with Penix's old coach. I just hope the Bryce experience isn't enough to sour everyone on Alabama QBs.

I mean, imagine if one reason Chicago didn't draft Stroud because they already had an Ohio State QB that they hated...

Their school really doesn't matter, that is all history by the draft. Can they play physically in the NFL and do they have a mind & personality that can be coached to a professional level? The school thing is so overblown and all of the stuff at that level is just lower level practice as far as the NFL is concerned. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

My order for the draft was this:

1. Stroud

2. Levis

3. Richardson

 

 

4. DTR

5. Bryce

The top three are three rounds better than DTR or Bryce. Just because someone else would’ve taken Bryce if we hadn’t doesn’t make them right either. 
 

I’ve also seen people comparing Bryce and Caleb Williams but Williams has something Bryce doesn’t, and that is speed, belief, swagger, and arm strength. I think Williams, Daniels, Maye, and Nix all have the chance to be better than everyone from 2023, including Stroud. Maybe not this year, but in their career. 
 

Now 2025 is a QB Desert unless you want someone like Cam Ward or Carson Beck, neither of which are ideal. 
 

I know I’d draft Joey Aguilar later in the draft. Dude has an NFL arm and RG3 confirmed as much after watching him throw in the monsoon that was the Cure Bowl. 

I am curious to see who the bigger bust will be between Richardson and Young. Could be a very close race.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am curious to see who the bigger bust will be between Richardson and Young. Could be a very close race.

I mean you could try to turn AR into a tight end/Taysom Hill if qb1 doesn't work out. Can't put Bryce anywhere else on the field 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30 Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
    • He isn't a good HC. I think he has proved that conclusively.
    • The missed tackle percentage is on that screen cap.
×
×
  • Create New...