Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Charlotte the worst sports city right now?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You do know the biggest military base in the US is located just an hour from Raleigh in Fort Bragg right?

Military families are family oriented. A hour drive to games is nothing compared to traveling 3 hours to Charlotte.

 

Cmon man there is nothing happening in Western Carolina other than Charlotte. I only go west for outdoor activities and some nature/mountain views.

Nfl leaders don't look at the population of just the city itself.  Charlotte has three of the top fifty combined statistical areas within a 1 to 1.5 hour drive.  Charlotte, Greensboro/WS/High Point, and Greenville Spartanburg.  Those three statistical areas include nearly 7 million people.  Other than Raleigh, the only one in the top fifty within an hour and half of raleigh is Greensboro.  So only about 4-5 million people.  Charlotte has many more people to draw from.  

Also, many of the surrounding communities for Raleigh are not native born.  If memory serves, many still refer to Cary as Containment area for relocated Yankees.  One of the reasons the Canes do so well is a significant portion of the population are people who moved from Northern Areas.  Would that population translate into support for a NFL team?  Hard to say, but I see a tremendous amount of Giants/Jets jerseys in the triangle when I forced to endure the crazy traffic on 40/85.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Nfl leaders don't look at the population of just the city itself.  Charlotte has three of the top fifty combined statistical areas within a 1 to 1.5 hour drive.  Charlotte, Greensboro/WS/High Point, and Greenville Spartanburg.  Those three statistical areas include nearly 7 million people.  Other than Raleigh, the only one in the top fifty within an hour and half of raleigh is Greensboro.  So only about 4-5 million people.  Charlotte has many more people to draw from.  

Also, many of the surrounding communities for Raleigh are not native born.  If memory serves, many still refer to Cary as Containment area for relocated Yankees.  One of the reasons the Canes do so well is a significant portion of the population are people who moved from Northern Areas.  Would that population translate into support for a NFL team?  Hard to say, but I see a tremendous amount of Giants/Jets jerseys in the triangle when I forced to endure the crazy traffic on 40/85.  

Population has nothing to do with fans being loud at games. The fact Charlotte has more people just shows you why the games are 50/50. Raleigh is smaller and has a more passionate fanbase. The city is together. Charlotte doesn't have that vibe.

Charlotte will continue to suck at attendance because not many people really care about their local team. It's just not a sports city imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 This is just stupid. If Tepper owned the team and they were in your backyard it wouldn’t be any different after 6 losing seasons. People would be pissed and it just wouldn’t be any different. 

This malaise is Tepper generated. 

Edited by strato
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Population has nothing to do with fans being loud at games. The fact Charlotte has more people just shows you why the games are 50/50. Raleigh is smaller and has a more passionate fanbase. The city is together. Charlotte doesn't have that vibe.

Charlotte will continue to suck at attendance because not many people really care about their local team. It's just not a sports city imo.

generally speaking, to be committed to bad teams......you need time.  Born into it. Generations. I mean, that's why people support the Jets, or Cubs or whoever that can suck for a decade.  Panthers still lack the time to have a "proper fanbase".  40 year olds still grew up on different teams because they didn't exist. 

so the Charlotte teams are largely in the you have to be good for people to care window.  One of the reasons Raleigh is deemed a passionate fanbase is the Hurricanes actually had early success and are currently succesful.  In the postseason year 2 and in the Stanley Cup by year 5.  Then won it a couple years after that.  I mean, that's actually beyond early success.  That was great success.   And if you look more recently, they have had 6 straight playoff seasons. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philadelphia has fans who put batteries in snow balls then throw them at opposing players and fans. Now that is a poo hole sports city. Not to mention an entire downtown area that looks like a war zone where people walk the streets like zombies due to all the fentanyl being taken. No sports city gets worse than that. Yeah, their football team may have performed better in recent years but that city and many of their fans SUCK something awful!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CRA said:

generally speaking, to be committed to bad teams......you need time.  Born into it. Generations. I mean, that's why people support the Jets, or Cubs or whoever that can suck for a decade.  Panthers still lack the time to have a "proper fanbase".  40 year olds still grew up on different teams because they didn't exist. 

so the Charlotte teams are largely in the you have to be good for people to care window.  One of the reasons Raleigh is deemed a passionate fanbase is the Hurricanes actually had early success and are currently succesful.  In the postseason year 2 and in the Stanley Cup by year 5.  Then won it a couple years after that.  I mean, that's actually beyond early success.  That was great success.   And if you look more recently, they have had 6 straight playoff seasons. 

"Panthers still lack the time to have a proper fanbase"....Uh...29 years and two SB appearances says... Wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, 3838 said:

"Panthers still lack the time to have a proper fanbase"....Uh...29 years and two SB appearances says... Wrong.

Still fighting the remnants of the old timers who were normally either Redskins, Cowboys, or Falcons from when the Carolinas were NFL No Man’s Land.

Those are deep roots. I was a Johnny U fan when I was a kid. If Irsay hadn’t left Baltimore like he did I’d have had an issue when the Panthers came to life. 

I actually remember JR in his playing days with the Colts, fwiw btw snafu.

And all the transplants make it tougher too 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, 3838 said:

"Panthers still lack the time to have a proper fanbase"....Uh...29 years and two SB appearances says... Wrong.

I mean, 40 year olds that grew up on other teams.....simply aren't the same as people that were passed down a team for generations in their family.  When I was kid, my favorite player was Darrell Greene.  Because my team was the Skins.  If the Panthers suck, I can just watch the NFL at large.  It is what it is.  I adopted the Panthers because they were the local team. 

The Panthers and the Browns simply aren't going to have the same fanbases right now.  Shouldn't be expected.  And most of the real purchasing power is with people who didn't grow up with the Panthers.  The money isn't with a 19 year olds. 

and if the Hurricanes were less successful, people wouldn't be hyping the Raleigh fanbase as much.  But I can concede that is slightly different, as hockey isn't big in the south so most in the area haven't switched over from other teams.  It's their introduction to the sport.  Which makes the Hurricanes a little different than other franchises.  They probably compare better with Charlotte FC IMO.  If you gave Raleigh a random MLB team that sucked......I don't that folks could get away with claiming Raliegh fans are "built different" than Charlotte folks. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...