Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is the deal with Plummer?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, NAS said:

 

My biggest concern is how do you evaluate wide receivers

Route running, separation, blocking. Basically everything but catching. 

I think Dalton would have received a lot of reps had he not been injured/recovering. I don’t get why Luton didn’t get more reps than Plummer. He has shown to be a better choice for QB3 if we even keep 3. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NAS said:

 

My biggest concern is how do you evaluate wide receivers

Especially when there's a guy on the bench that's looked better in the very limited action he's had.  You can disrespect the fans all you want by playing whoever.  That's the team's prerogative, and I don't really care.  But damn these guys are out there trying to make plays and get good stuff on film, and this dude is not even practice squad level.  It's wild.

  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Route running, separation, blocking. Basically everything but catching. 

I think Dalton would have received a lot of reps had he not been injured/recovering. I don’t get why Luton didn’t get more reps than Plummer. He has shown to be a better choice for QB3 if we even keep 3. 

This is my only answer I can come up with to your question.

Season 5 Episode 3 GIF by Paramount+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Likely because he knows the calls better than Luton as he's been here longer. He showed his knowledge of the offense a little bit with how he got Dillon Johnson lined up in the second half.

I'd be surprised if he makes the PS tho. Lot of QBs out there about to get cut and the Panthers will likely want a QB3 they believe they can depend on.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...