Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who are You Drafting with the #1 Pick of 2025???


Hoenheim
 Share

Who you drafting?   

101 members have voted

  1. 1. What Player?

    • Quinn Ewers (QB Texas)
      44
    • Sheddur Sanders (QB Colorado)
      10
    • Carson Beck (QB Gerogia)
      18
    • Luther Burden III (WR Missouri)
      1
    • James Pearce (DE Tennessee)
      6
    • Travis Hunter (CB/WR Colorado)
      8
    • Another QB
      11
    • Another DE
      2
    • Another CB
      0
    • Another WR
      0


Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, scratched said:

Once again, as I said before we drafted BY, we need to build the team before we take a chance on a 1st rd QB. We need to sign a solid veteran, and draft best player available. I think someone like Hunter should be who we target. If we have first pick, we can trade down and get him somewhere in top ten. WE NEED TALENT! AND LOTS OF IT! 

Have to disagree. I think one of the absolutes in football is that if your team needs a QB and you’re in a position to get a guy you believe in, you do it, regardless of the state of the rest of the team. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean Id give DC one more year just on general principle but if we are in the top 3 then morgan has to go.  There is no excuse

Ehat is the difference in keeping DC next year vs Morgan this year? I can keep going but it's a pattern.

It's house cleaning time in Carolina if he doesn't show a lot in the next 16 games. He looks like a yes man so I'm fine with dumping that dead weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I'll apply!

I'd sincerely like to have an entire draft done by online polling. We could be the first team ever to do it. Good way to re-engage a demoralized fan-base. And honestly, do you think we could possibly do worse than the people who are paid to do it currently?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Captroop said:

I'd sincerely like to have an entire draft done by online polling. We could be the first team ever to do it. Good way to re-engage a demoralized fan-base. And honestly, do you think we could possibly do worse than the people who are paid to do it currently?

No, we actually couldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...