Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So the Defense...


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

I cant even remember any of the high dollar defensive players names being called much.  This game was bad for the offense but even more so for the defense.  Allowing a division rival to run up the score is inexcusable.  Defense is suppose to be the stength of the team and it was god awful today.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chknwing said:

I cant even remember any of the high dollar defensive players names being called much.  This game was bad for the offense but even more so for the defense.  Allowing a division rival to run up the score is inexcusable.  Defense is suppose to be the stength of the team and it was god awful today.

But Clowney is home!

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, chknwing said:

I cant even remember any of the high dollar defensive players names being called much.  This game was bad for the offense but even more so for the defense.  Allowing a division rival to run up the score is inexcusable.  Defense is suppose to be the stength of the team and it was god awful today.

Brown is the only high dollar defensive player.

This unit has been gutted and all of the resources invested in the offence (what we've paid those two OGs is obscene).

There's very little NFL talent on that side of the ball this season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the run D would be much better. I don’t know. I honestly half heartedly watched it and just got to the point I didn’t want to rewatch much so I didn’t get a lot of out it. 
 

If I did rewatch I would try to find a couple of spots where guys made business decisions after the score got to a place. 

As far as OP, I never thought that the defense was considered a strength this year. It was downgraded and they admitted they are waiting for someone to take the job in two positions. 
I might be able to stomach watching later this week because it is something I’d like to look at… how the defense did. 
 

I wasn’t too upset when it went to 7-0 because I missed the busted TD play. I had figured NO would do well with the first scripted set of plays. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...