Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Are You Doing as a Fan??


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

For me its like the stock market................if I'm fully invested and the market (team) is doing well then I pay close attention to what is going on and enjoy the ride.

However, if the market (team) is in trouble or bearish then I've cashed out and sit on the sidelines not paying much attention to it until something gets a rally going back to a bull market...............and much like the stock market this team can be the same.........

That stated if this team was the market then I'm out and not paying much attention until something happens in the future for now..........and whatever time it takes to get back in the swing of things........(ahem) if ever with Big Brain as the owner......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally not too bad. I think having a coach I believe can turn this thing around is great. I was only hoping to see improvement offensively. It's a little better then I hope TBH, it seems like Canales and Idzik know how to tailor an offense for the QB. That in turn makes me feel better about them getting an opportunity to bring their guy in at QB ( whenever that is, I'd imagine in the next 2 years ). 

Defense is just thin and getting thinner, hard to control that. Off loading Burns was the right move.  I would imagine that next off season will be focused on fixing the defensive side as much as possible. Which brings me to Dan Morgan. I just got a soft spot for him so I am a little bias in my rooting for him. I think he did a pretty good job all things considered. Draft was solid, not amazing. Free Agency I liked what they did for the most part ( can't remember it all lol ), I don't think we were going to sign any all stars this year but hopefully the role players we got can shine as we add some talent next to them next year. One thing I think we will get from Morgan is more value on tape vs analytics, which I think has really sunk our drafts/FAs over the last few years. 

 

Basically I believe we have a good foundation to build on here. Players are in on the coach and he looks like he has the vision and ability to create an identity here and I think Dan Morgan is alright. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Side note - I hated the switch to the 3-4 defense. I don't think this team has ever fielded a worthwhile 3-4. Go back to 4-3 please.

Teppers bent on being the Steelers defense with more data driven decisions. 34 isn't going anywhere. Closest we'll get to a 43 again is a 33 or 35 stack like Snow ran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are seeing  the result of

1. Multiple coaches,  during Tepper,  throwing multiple philosophies against the wall to see if it would stick   It  isn’t  just offense  it is defense as well  

2 in turn, scouting and talent evaluation failures trying to answer  on that moving philosophy   They cant 

3. Finally, Relying too much on analytics instead of the eye test, on field performance, and just as importantly, does the player have the heart  for what is a  52 week job in the nfl and that includes constant training snd rehab

4  the final domino of 1 trough 3 has fallen……the domino of poor drafting and free agency 

i see no way out of this as the lack of talent is obvious 

as for me, ive stopped caring. A bad owner cannot be fixed 

if the franchise is lucky, 4 years minimum and thats if Tepper stays with  Canales  and Morgan 

Bottom line, if the foundation is poor, the house falls. The house has fallen   There is no foundation so accept it. Watch the Panthers occasionally but honestly, watch the good teams and you will know how bad this team is  and how pointlessly it is to invest in them

sad to say these things

enjoy the fall and the holidays 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

They did when Dom was the head coach. Since then it's been a disaster. 

Unless you’re loaded with all pro/ pro bowl talent, it’s always a disaster. You need lock down corners and a stupid stable of pass rushers with other worldly DTs. Either way it’s exciting… usually for the wrong team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

The game was poetic.  The Bears used our #1 pick and DJ Moore to absolutely decimate a defense that is horribly depleted because of all the other picks we had to give them just to have the QB we got in exchange sit on the bench.  It was beautiful in a way.  A true full circle moment.

This rendered even funnier by the initial selling point for said quarterback was that he'd be so great you wouldn't need to get elite weapons for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't been invested like I was 8 years ago, in a while.  I'll watch if I have nothing else going on but this team isn't worth carving 3+ hours of your Sunday for anymore over.... almost anything.  Background noise maybe if you're doing other things.  Years ago I'd just brute force myself into watching until you realize you're watching for entertainment and it's just not entertaining.  Life is too short.  I'm not going to dump them and find another team though.

Also I really hope the Hornets are fun this year and everyone keeps telling me it's time to get into hockey lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...