Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would You Get a QB in 2025 draft, or not??

Hoenheim

By Hoenheim,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted (edited)

I think you take a QB in the upcoming draft so long as Canales wants him of course. To pass on a QB because "experts" don't think it's a good class makes no sense. Experts thought Young would be good. Pull the trigger again and see what happens. To wait until 2026 for another rookie QB is just plain depressing. Try try try again. We also need to start getting younger and unloading some vets. Expensive journeymen who are being overpaid will lead us nowhere.

On a positive note we're at rock bottom. This is as low as we can be imo. Get this season over with and start the rebuild.

Edited by pantherj
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You win some, you lose some, but you live to fight another day.

 

Was wrong on Bryce, but damn I made up for it with Daniels the following year.

I thought Bryce would be good still. Just thought Stroud was the safer pick with the higher ceiling. Stroud’s arm talent was (is)  just unreal…

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Lol...its a weak class every year.  It's only strong after everybody sees some results. Thats thr logic everybody follows now but won't say it out loud. 

Yeah the loaded class of TLaw, Zach Wilson, Lance, Fields, and Mac Jones wasn’t that loaded after all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, pantherj said:

I think you take a QB in the upcoming draft so long as Canales wants him of course. To pass on a QB because "experts" don't think it's a good class makes no sense. Experts thought Young would be good. Pull the trigger again and see what happens. To wait until 2026 for another rookie QB is just plain depressing. Try try try again. We also need to start getting younger and unloading some vets. Expensive journeymen who are being overpaid will lead us nowhere.

On a positive note we're at rock bottom. This is as low as we can be imo. Get this season over with and start the rebuild.

Depends if we can land a serviceable bridge QB. You get one of those and we can try to build an actual roster for a rookie QB to be out in later. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You thought this year class was weak?

 

Caleb/Daniels/Maye were legit franchise QB prospects.

People said it was weak in 2023. Like the people in 2022 were saying about 2023 (which it was, except for Stroud). 

This is why we should wait for the season to play out. Players at that age (and experience level) can make non linear leaps in a fairly short time. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Depends if we can land a serviceable bridge QB. You get one of those and we can try to build an actual roster for a rookie QB to be out in later. 

Obviously, the worst thing would be to force it just because of need.

I only would accept using a high pick like that again on a QB if Canales swore by him. And just because, in these circumstances, that should be his call. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jmac Grand Master

Jmac

Posted
Posted (edited)

They have to find a QB that  is reliable and can execute the offense effectively. Maybe it's Dalton for another year or not. Doesn't need to be a franchise QB at this time. The Defense needs all the help it can get.

With a competent QB and a rebuild defense, they could actually  compete in this division.

Edited by Jmac
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted

Yes. Hopefully they learned something and just make it 1 pick vs years of needed swings. 

There is no other position that effects as much of the game like QBs. Just get over Bryce and hope they make solid swings at other guys. 

They also don't have to hedge their bets and bring in a vet since Andy really doesn't have a lot of football left. (Yes I love him being here this year as a mercy but that's not a long term answer).

If your going to have a project in the next draft then a QB isn't a bad waste of a pick. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You thought this year class was weak?

Caleb/Daniels/Maye were legit franchise QB prospects.

NOPE. I thought it was strong. Just couldn't dwell on it cuz we had no first round pick and bryce young. I was saying the overall opinion is that its weak every year not my personal opinion. 

Edited by CPF4LIFE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...