Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official is it GameDay thread?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CRA said:

I mean, he had moments of not horrific.  Clearly Canales fears that because Andy should be done for today.   He is old.  You don’t put old men out there in beatdowns to take damage if they are your starting QB. 

poor roster managment.  He should of added a QB he could sub in for these moments 

Yep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, frankw said:

Oof. It does give off the Matt Rhule and his wife wooing our decision makers with meatballs vibe.

Screenshot_20241020_181123_Firefox.thumb.jpg.267e1b097bc2a9aa7b34702289bec180.jpg

Tepper and Hurney hired Rhule based on "a feeling"...

Feelings also involved in the hire of Dave Canales...

Perhaps we need more thinking and less feeling 😕

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

We just spent 150M on guards, traded for Dionte Johnson, and traded up to draft XL....lol. Blame whoever you want but we should have enough talent

Not to mention all of this in direct detriment to the defense.

I've heard enough wailing about lack of talent.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

We just spent 150M on guards, traded for Dionte Johnson, and traded up to draft XL....lol. Blame whoever you want but we should have enough talent

Not a single star on this entire roster.

 

Brown was headed towards star, but he's injured.

 

I'm sorry but compare this roster to anybody else and it's clear we lack talent.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I mean, he had moments of not horrific.  Clearly Canales fears that because Andy should be done for today.   He is old.  You don’t put old men out there in beatdowns to take damage if they are your starting QB. 

poor roster managment.  He should of added a QB he could sub in for these moments 

Plummer is sitting on his ass...put him in. What's the difference 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only WR that makes sense in the first is KC Concepcion. He fills multiple roles in the offense and is a PR specialist.
    • That depends upon what happens with receiver this year and what happens with free agency next year. Hopefully we'll be good by addressing receiver this year (regardless of whether we snag one in the first round or not). If we don't and are unlucky enough for to Coker get hurt (and X solidifies his bust status, and JAGs be JAGing), then we may be fùçked! But I assume that Dan Morgan and company will feel compelled to look for answers in free agency and use that to set up the draft just like this offseason.  Reality is not as simple as we drafted this position X times in a row in the first. If you're suggesting that we could draft a position in the first four times in a row, that's not likely. At some point probability has to be taken into account. I mean, how many years in a row can you be unlucky with one position?  As I've said at times before, you try and plan for the long term personnel-wise and cap-wise of course, but things happen so, in a sense, you still must look at each season--each "team" if you will--unto itself each season. So many things can happen between now and then. A major industry can profoundly impact the bigger picture (like this year), someone could offer you a trade proposal that you can't resist, players might not have progressed to your expectations--you know, things like that. Moreover, you have to be aware of the dynamics of each draft class, including the fact that there could be unexpected draft risers and fallers during the college season. That's a lot. As of today, we expect the 2027 draft to have more exclamations than question marks at OT and the QB class and WR group is expected to be exceptionally strong. We'll have a clearer picture of whatever we'll have to focus on next year at this time.  Lastly, keep in mind that there's always more than one way to get you to where you want to go. The yearly puzzle is not static, it's dynamic and complex.   
    • I'm fine with Thieneman or McNeil-Warren.. Rodriguez won't last until 51 so they would have to trade up, he may end up being a late first round selection. Anthony Hill Jr. is more likely to be available. I don't expect defense in the first round now after the murmurings of finding another weapon for Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...