Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Bryce deserve another start?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, NAS said:

Going to ignore the stupid thread that proclaims Bryce the future.

Just like I indicated last week, he took a step in the right direction and continues to build confidence. He still is inconsistent and the offense stalls at times but today he showed he can operate the offense and make some tough throws under pressure. 

Canales was not ready to proclaim him the starter next week but I think you have to keep him in and have him build on his last two games.  What say you?

One could say this thread is stupid also considering you're saying he took a step in the right direction against the worst defense in the league 

Screenshot_20241103_162650_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The schedule gets brutal after the bye, and a possible loss in another country to the giants is not gonna help things. We will so what kind of gymnastics we hear when the losses start piling up again. 

Very interesting to see how this season finishes out. I think at some point you have to raise the expectations to know how to approach next season. Like the 150 pass yds 1 TD games is not gonna cut it. Gotta shoot for more than that. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NAS said:

Going to ignore the stupid thread that proclaims Bryce the future.

Just like I indicated last week, he took a step in the right direction and continues to build confidence. He still is inconsistent and the offense stalls at times but today he showed he can operate the offense and make some tough throws under pressure. 

Canales was not ready to proclaim him the starter next week but I think you have to keep him in and have him build on his last two games.  What say you?

I don’t think one good outing against the hapless Saints is enough to determine whether or not Bryce Young has improved.  I remember Mike Dick once said that the New Orleans Saints were the elixir of the National Football League.  And he is not wrong on this. I’ve seen many of Saints game where the Saints are so horrible. They make a poor team look like they are super.
 

Between Andy Dalton and Bryce Young, I don’t think there’s much choice. I don’t think it would hurt at this point to play him on a few more games against better opponents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

This is obvious anywhere but the huddle. You play the dude the whole season. Dalton is A 37 YEAR OLD FREE AGENT.

So by your logic regarding Dalton the #1 overall pick from last year should be unequivocally separating himself significantly from the 37 year old washed up QB in question yes?

What do the numbers say though?

2024:

Dalton 160 pass attempts 66.3 completion % 989 yards 7 touchdowns 6 interceptions 6.2 yards per attempt

Young 128 pass attempts 60.2 completion % 694 yards 3 touchdowns 6 interceptions 5.4 yards per attempt

Not seeing separation there. Both look like backups at best.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, frankw said:

So by your logic regarding Dalton the #1 overall pick from last year should be unequivocally separating himself significantly from the 37 year old washed up QB in question yes?

What do the numbers say though?

2024:

Dalton 160 pass attempts 66.3 completion % 989 yards 7 touchdowns 6 interceptions 6.2 yards per attempt

Young 128 pass attempts 60.2 completion % 694 yards 3 touchdowns 6 interceptions 5.4 yards per attempt

Not seeing separation there. Both look like backups at best.

Frankw that's not what he's saying. Dalton has the best body of work so far this season. No one denies that. But you have a 37 years old QB who will be a FA next season that is trending down, and a 23 years old on a rookie contract trending upwards. You go with the young guy if possible. You find reasons to go with the young guy until he makes you go the other direction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...