Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fowler on Bryce Young


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, raleigh-panther said:

 

i would love to be wrong.  Im not

The fact as to if BW will turn into a quality NFL starter remains to be seen.  Everything else is just opinion.  This list is why I don't want to trade him for a bag of dildos.

Alex Smith
Steve Young
Terry Bradshaw
Drew Brees
Rich Gannon
Vinny Testaverde
Jim Plunkett
Brett Favre
Ryan Tannehill
Doug Williams
Tommy Maddox
Jake Plummer
Josh Allen
Jordan Love

And before anyone starts with the "buts" to illustrate why BW's situation is different I'll add my only contention is that there is a long list of QB's who improve and get better.  The potential upside is huge while the downside of continuing with BW for the rest of this season is very low.  Also, compare that potential to the available alternatives.

This no chance, definitive stance is what drives me crazy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

The fact as to if BW will turn into a quality NFL starter remains to be seen.  Everything else is just opinion.  This list is why I don't want to trade him for a bag of dildos.

Alex Smith
Steve Young
Terry Bradshaw
Drew Brees
Rich Gannon
Vinny Testaverde
Jim Plunkett
Brett Favre
Ryan Tannehill
Doug Williams
Tommy Maddox
Jake Plummer
Josh Allen
Jordan Love

And before anyone starts with the "buts" to illustrate why BW's situation is different I'll add my only contention is that there is a long list of QB's who improve and get better.  The potential upside is huge while the downside of continuing with BW for the rest of this season is very low.  Also, compare that potential to the available alternatives.

This no chance, definitive stance is what drives me crazy.

 

Im old

ive seen each of those players live

Bryce isnt in their category 

look, not trying to upset people

Ar end of the bye, you will see who Bryce is and isnt

125 yards against  the  Giants should tell you 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

Young at least isn’t making the big mistake. I won’t go overboard here praising Young like the TV broadcast did. Yes, he made some nice first-half throws, but he also only had a handful of completions after halftime, threw for just 126 yards the entire game and missed several very makeable throws late. Carolina had a great chance to run out the clock on its final possession, but Young and company couldn’t do it (this also had to do with Canales’ unimaginative playcalling). 

Still, Young didn’t turn the ball over and Jones threw two red-zone interceptions for the Giants. All of that was huge. 

Once 2-17 as a starter for Carolina, Young has now improved to 4-17. Which is still terrible, but objectively not as terrible. Young has done enough to start again when Carolina plays next after its upcoming bye week — at home vs. Kansas City and Patrick Mahomes on Nov. 24. Whew! Good luck winning three in a row, Carolina.

I actually think besides a couple games Canales actually has some really good offensive play calls.  Some duds too but he's a rookie hc.  I can definitely see some good concepts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jaxel said:

It's true that Canales playcalling is as unimaginative as Fowler's writing. He does a great job of pointing out the obvious.

Amen.  I don’t see understand how he has had a job with The Charlotte Observer as long as he has.  He’s terrible at his job.  Only thing I like about him is that he gets under Tepper’s skin at his press conferences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Randolph Panther said:

Might as well ride him out for the remainder of the year.  Lets see if he can progress to the point he is a serviceable player.

Eh....ride him until the wheels fall off. We need to focus on developing our other young players. Bryce's development is significantly lower on the priority list since he has conclusively proved he is not a starting NFL QB.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really believe the playbook is simple because of so many rookies and a 1st year offense. New O-line players (but vets) with now a 2nd year center. 3 rookies at WR and TE. I hope as they grow it keeps opening up and Canales feels he can trust them. Same on defense. Rookie MLB, rookies on the DL. A rookie at slot DB. But right now he's always said, just do the basics and be good at it, then you can develop into more. 

Good steps early enough to save the season as in it gives the team and fans hope for the future as to they are building in the right direction. A good showing, even if we lose against KC will be another nice step forward. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...