Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales still not sold on Bryce?


Jackson113.2
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Of course he isn't sold on Young.  No one in their right mind would be.  

Might be a little encouraged though.  

I can't imagine any Bryce supporters on here would actually put their job on the line for him if they were the head coach of this team and had a chance to try and upgrade next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Icege said:

He's been fairly consistent about not naming the starter until late to keep a competitive advantage + evaluate practice reps.

Kind of weird that folks are upset about Canales making Bryce earn starts after all of the butthurt over him being "handed" the job his rookie season.

EXACTLY 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

This is the polite way of saying "Bryce is not the qb I want in my offense" 

I can tell you this, coaches know within few practices if the QB can play or not. Dave knowns BY is severely limited. He's also forcing BY to be on edge, good for a player that been on the best teams since HS. He needs pressure. 

 

I can even go back, way back.....when the redskins drafted heath shuler and Gus Frerotte. Mark "stink" Schlereth said within 15 mins the OL knew Gus was the better QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AceBoogie said:

Umm Andy played the worst team in the league. And hasn’t played that well since. 

Ummm, the defense was a M*A*S*H ward for several games while Andy was starting. They finally have gotten healthy and it shows. Let's see Bryce overcome 30+ points for a win.  My point is, if this new Bryce Young is legit, he should be able to compete with the Chiefs.  Odds are he can't.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm leaning more to your observations. To be honest they are down to seeing if either one of them can at least be a backup next season. What they do for a starter is I would like to know. 

We all have the list of FA QB's for 2025; it's not very good. We are also likely not in a position to grab a QB high in the upcoming draft and/or Canales may not think any of them are really his guy. In that case, one really needs to get the most value of what's already here. We have BY under contract for two more years. Dalton is going to be an additional cost to keep. There has to be enough about Dalton to justify keeping him around in some capacity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Ummm, the defense was a M*A*S*H ward for several games while Andy was starting. They finally have gotten healthy and it shows. Let's see Bryce overcome 30+ points for a win.  My point is, if this new Bryce Young is legit, he should be able to compete with the Chiefs.  Odds are he can't.

The Chiefs will lose 1 game this year....The Panthers are going to have the biggest upset in NFL HISTORY!!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, outlaw4 said:

We all have the list of FA QB's for 2025; it's not very good. We are also likely not in a position to grab a QB high in the upcoming draft and/or Canales may not think any of them are really his guy. In that case, one really needs to get the most value of what's already here. We have BY under contract for two more years. Dalton is going to be an additional cost to keep. There has to be enough about Dalton to justify keeping him around in some capacity. 

I would not be surprised if they di not take a qb in the 2nd round in the upcoming draft if it falls like many think it will. It just depends on how desperate the teams picking at the top get. This offseason will answer a lot of questions to what the team will be forced to do in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jasonluckydog said:

The Chiefs will lose 1 game this year....The Panthers are going to have the biggest upset in NFL HISTORY!!

Pass that stuff man. But seriously though, I think it actually would be. Who wouldn't love to see that?

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...