Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB stock market - week 18


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

It depends on if you're just talking about this season. If so, you can make a solid argument for Bryce over Stroud. If you're taking last season into account as well, Stroud has the edge.

Also, lol @ Aaron Rodgers 😆

2024

Stroud 19 td  12 int

Young 12 td  9 int

Youngs having a better year?

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

No context or reasoning for the placement.

But Bryce Young and Michael Penix Jr have a higher stock than CJ Stroud?

We'll see how that take ages.

I've always thought that Penix was a baller. If Penix were a stock, I'd absolutely buy him over Young and Stroud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NAS said:

Henry McKenna shares his point in time rankings heading into the last week of the regular season.  Full link here https://www.foxsports.com/stories/nfl/qb-stock-market-week-18-mvp-no-ones-talking-about

1. Joe Burrow, Cincinnati Bengals (+ 3)
2. Lamar Jackson, Baltimore Ravens (-1)
3. Josh Allen, Buffalo Bills (-1)
4. Jared Goff, Detroit Lions (- 1)
5. Sam Darnold, Minnesota Vikings (↔)

6. Patrick Mahomes, Kansas City Chiefs (+ 1)

7. Justin Herbert, Los Angeles Chargers (- 1)
8. Jayden Daniels, Washington Commanders(+ 1)
9. Baker Mayfield, Tampa Bay Buccaneers (+ 3)
10. Jordan Love, Green Bay Packers (- 2)
11. Matthew Stafford, Los Angeles Rams (- 1)
12. Geno Smith, Seattle Seahawks (+3)
13. Bo Nix, Denver Broncos (+ 3)

14. Bryce Young, Carolina Panthers (+ 3)
15. Brock Purdy, San Francisco 49ers (+5)
16. Russell Wilson, Pittsburgh Steelers (- 2)
17. Michael Penix, Atlanta Falcons (+ 7)
18. Kyler Murray, Arizona Cardinals (+ 2)
19. C.J. Stroud, Houston Texans (- 1)

20. Joe Flacco, Indianapolis Colts (new)
21. Drake Maye, New England Patriots (+ 1)

22. Kenny Pickett, Philadelphia Eagles (new)
23. Tyler Huntley, Miami Dolphins (new)
24. Drew Lock, New York Giants (+8)
25. Caleb Williams, Chicago Bears (- 2)
26. Mac Jones, Jacksonville Jaguars (+ 3)
27. Aidan O'Connell, Las Vegas Raiders (↔)
28. Spencer Rattler, New Orleans Saints (+ 2)
29. Aaron Rodgers, New York Jets (- 3)
30. Cooper Rush, Dallas Cowboys (-5)
31. Mason Rudolph, Tennessee Titans (-3)
32. Dorian Thompson-Robinson, Cleveland Browns (- 1)

Well, I'm convinced. Bryce is the real deal 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Shotgun said:

2024

Stroud 19 td  12 int

Young 12 td  9 int

Youngs having a better year?

First 8 games

Stroud: 11 total TDs, 4 Int

Young (first 5 games due to benching): 3 total TDs, 5 Int

Last 8 games:

Stroud: 8 total TDs 8 Int

Young: 13 total TDs 4 Int

Do people not understand the implication behind a QB's "stock"?  Or what "trend" means?  This is a lot more relevant of a statistical breakdown when we're talking about stock.  I've yet to see a single article proclaim Bryce > Stroud.  These comparisons, as of late, are always framed around Bryce trending up and Stroud trending down.  But the gap between the two after their rookie seasons was monumental.  So while Bryce may be taking steps to close the gap, he still has a lot of ground to make up before he even sniffs Stroud in the broader conversation.

I've poked around a few sites for overall QB power rankings and they all have Stroud at the 14-17 range and Bryce in the low 20's, which seems pretty fair to me.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

First 8 games

Stroud: 11 total TDs, 4 Int

Young (first 5 games due to benching): 3 total TDs, 5 Int

Last 8 games:

Stroud: 8 total TDs 8 Int

Young: 13 total TDs 4 Int

Do people not understand the implication behind a QB's "stock"?  Or what "trend" means?  This is a lot more relevant of a statistical breakdown when we're talking about stock.  I've yet to see a single article proclaim Bryce > Stroud.  These comparisons, as of late, are always framed around Bryce trending up and Stroud trending down.  But the gap between the two after their rookie seasons was monumental.  So while Bryce may be taking steps to close the gap, he still has a lot of ground to make up before he even sniffs Stroud in the broader conversation.

I've poked around a few sites for overall QB power rankings and they all have Stroud at the 14-17 range and Bryce in the low 20's, which seems pretty fair to me.

Exactly, Bryce is a growth stock right now compared to someone like Stroud whose growth slowed down this year but he is still offering solid dividends (e.g. playoffs) and his overall price is still much higher. 

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

First 8 games

Stroud: 11 total TDs, 4 Int

Young (first 5 games due to benching): 3 total TDs, 5 Int

Last 8 games:

Stroud: 8 total TDs 8 Int

Young: 13 total TDs 4 Int

Do people not understand the implication behind a QB's "stock"?  Or what "trend" means?  This is a lot more relevant of a statistical breakdown when we're talking about stock.  I've yet to see a single article proclaim Bryce > Stroud.  These comparisons, as of late, are always framed around Bryce trending up and Stroud trending down.  But the gap between the two after their rookie seasons was monumental.  So while Bryce may be taking steps to close the gap, he still has a lot of ground to make up before he even sniffs Stroud in the broader conversation.

I've poked around a few sites for overall QB power rankings and they all have Stroud at the 14-17 range and Bryce in the low 20's, which seems pretty fair to me.

I was responding to a post that said Young was having a better season than Stroud.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...