Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final PFF Grades

mav1234

By mav1234,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Definitely not going to improve a ton on the Defensive side as we kept the same coach.

Look for marginal defensive improvements at best. The offense can be decent if we add another playmaker. 

There's too many ifs that must go right to have much of a turn around. I'm not expecting much of an improvement on defense. It's just too bad. On offense there may or may not be any difference at all. There will be more chemistry between Young and his receivers but will it be enough to offset a terrible defense. I think you've seen throughout the playoffs how important a defense is to winning games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

There's too many ifs that must go right to have much of a turn around. I'm not expecting much of an improvement on defense. It's just too bad. On offense there may or may not be any difference at all. There will be more chemistry between Young and his receivers but will it be enough to offset a terrible defense. I think you've seen throughout the playoffs how important a defense is to winning games. 

 

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

There's too many ifs that must go right to have much of a turn around. I'm not expecting much of an improvement on defense. It's just too bad. On offense there may or may not be any difference at all. There will be more chemistry between Young and his receivers but will it be enough to offset a terrible defense. I think you've seen throughout the playoffs how important a defense is to winning games. 

So far i have just seen that talent beats everything, Most of these games were blowouts because the other teams just dont have the heavy hitter players. 

The Vikings were 5th in ppg allowed and got beat by a team with more talented individual players at the positions that matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TD alt Grand Master

TD alt

Posted
Posted

I'm not going to be overly critical because it's too early to judge some of these guys (and I have to keep telling myself that), but they could do a much better job of actually drafting players. If we have another draft like the last, it will be one helluva red flag.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shotgun Grand Master

Shotgun

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

Definitely not going to improve a ton on the Defensive side as we kept the same coach.

Look for marginal defensive improvements at best. The offense can be decent if we add another playmaker. 

I bet Evero gets canned at the end of next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R0CKnR0LLA Mentor

R0CKnR0LLA

Posted
Posted

Man, that defense unit is compete ass. I think the CB group is decent-ish and grade out worse than they really are due to zero pressure from the front 7 and no safety help. But damn that entire DLine, LBer and safety group, just utter garbage tier.

Also think giving Jewell an $18.75 million contract to be a bottom tier LBer doesn't get talked about enough.

I also remember saying around mid-season that Coker should be ahead of XL on the depth chart, and nothing has happened to change my mind since. Forcing a ton of snaps and targets to XL despite his poor play has been a real determent to the team.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cuttinedge Proficient

Cuttinedge

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I think he had some VERY bad games, mixed with some good ones. 

But but I was told on another thread he was as good as Surtain and he deserved top cb money   I like JC but I don’t understand some people’s infatuation like he does no wrong he does plenty wrong hence 57th out of 116 

 All pro or not I remember trai turner making it one year when he was up for a contract. Then he got paid and fat 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DamnItJake!
      EVERYONE UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS IN YOUR PROFILE

      By DamnItJake! · Posted

      The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • KillerKat
       Carolina Hurricanes vs.Vegas Golden Knights  (Stanley Cup Final Game 1) | ESPN on ABC Tuesday, June 2 | 8:00 PM

      By KillerKat · Posted

      Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...