Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Saints Organization helped Protect Pedo-Priests


bLACKpANTHER
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Community and shared belief can be a good thing, but organized religion is a scourge on humanity. Catholicism is one of the worst, or at the very least directly owns some very big, very ugly blemishes.

A religion where it's religious leaders are forbidden to have any type of urges while at the same time being locked in a closet listening to people spill their dirtiest secrets. What could possibly go wrong?

I don't know why anyone would want to protect those that prey on the innocent while spouting their religious server. Just doesn't make sense to me. 

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

 

I don't know why anyone would want to protect those that prey on the innocent while spouting their religious server. Just doesn't make sense to me. 

 

Seems to be very common these days, actually, and applicable to the majority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, KSpan said:

Community and shared belief can be a good thing, but organized religion is a scourge on humanity. Catholicism is one of the worst, or at the very least directly owns some very big, very ugly blemishes.

Yikes on that take 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KSpan said:

Community and shared belief can be a good thing, but organized religion is a scourge on humanity. Catholicism is one of the worst, or at the very least directly owns some very big, very ugly blemishes.

Anything that man touches he tarnishes with corruption.  Never before has religion been weaponized and used by political figures as it has been recently.  According to Pew Research center, and I had a discussion with a Methodist minister about this recently, Gen X-Z are disassociating from the church in record numbers.  Those in power or seeking riches on earth use it to manipulate....It is called menticide in some cases--brainwashing.  To see it for what it is, you have to be objective and willing to see what is under the blanket.  Pew says that 50% of the American churches--mostly evangelical, will not exist in 2050.  For the first time ever, American youth value "common sense" (36%) over spirituality (24%) when making ethical decisions.  So no, the church is not above corruption, greed, and manipulation of the masses.  This is not really new--but it is being exploited now like never before.  Because of more access to the media, Children are less likely to be scared into church and forced to believe the dogma as before.  They see the greed, lying, and manipulation.  This is not mocking Jesus or God--this is exposing those who distort images of Jesus and God so that they can rape, rob, and manipulate you to vote one way or another.  This $50 million dollar preacher knows what I am talking about, as did/does Jim Bakker, Catholic priests, Falwell, Swaggart, etc. 

url.jpg.2ca2675b1cc30a39542cf2ad0cd82a71.jpg

 

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KSpan said:

Community and shared belief can be a good thing, but organized religion is a scourge on humanity. Catholicism is one of the worst, or at the very least directly owns some very big, very ugly blemishes.

Let’s be honest, this is just a human thing. Pretty sure evil people are in just about every nook and cranny. The bigger the story, the more we hear about it. I don’t think the Nickelodeon/Hollywood pedos are into religion.

Acting as if the removal of religion would turn this world into a wonderful place is very myopic. I don’t think the Catholoc church has assaulted more children than the weird uncles/awful parents of the world, but it’s easier to attack a single entity.

Saints suck and I hope they get folded.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...