Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tyler Warren


 Share

Recommended Posts

bro, he does have impressive highlights and coming from pen state....they are turning out athletic freaks shows. 

Just TE is after RB, SS, and C in value terms. I hold it much higher, but the league doesn't. 

They just need every spot and depth. History has shown its best to wait on TE. Like half the league and the elite came from the 3rd 4th round. 

The deal is they need at least 2, cause Dave base is 12personal

I do see a lane in which the Panthers draft a defense stud at 8th and use the 57th on TE. 

I always want to control the middle of the field, TE allow that. I got no clue why the league doesn't pay or value them. If I was GM, Id have two studs at TE and pay whatever top dollar is (14millper LOL) for each. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at #8 for me. He lacks the agility of recent prospects like Bowers, Laporta, and Kincaid. He is a beast, but I don’t think that’s our route with all of our holes. Plus, we have a promising young player already in our TE room. 
 

I’d prefer we sign someone like Austin Hooper to a cheap deal to go along with Sanders and mentor him. Maybe take a shot at someone like Briningstool, Nesbit, Lachey later in the draft. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I would rather take the slow wr if they go offense. I would never ever take a TE in the top 10. Hell I would take an OT before I would take Warren at 8.

I kind of agree, before I saw how much Bowers has changed the future forecast of the Raiders.   That said I still think I agree on not taking a te at 8, but if they take him i won't be outraged. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tr3ach said:

I kind of agree, before I saw how much Bowers has changed the future forecast of the Raiders.   That said I still think I agree on not taking a te at 8, but if they take him i won't be outraged. 

I would be pissed. There's no way you do that. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

This team is that deviod of talent we just need to add studs. And if that's a TE in the top 10 so be it. But if it fails that's a fireable offence for a GM 

The team is devoid of talent and so is the top of the draft.  Take the best chip that falls.  It's that simple.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tr3ach said:

A lot of people are saying there are 4 blue chip guys in this draft.  Those would be Carter, Graham, Hunter, and.. Warren.  Throw away positional value and he's probably the best player on the board ar 8.  

 

Out of the best guys I follow- there's only 2 blue chips; Carter and hunter. 

Graham is short armed DT devalued, played next to a beast/team, he cheat by being a wrestler (pros will not care)

Warren is a white TE and boxes out defenders rather than getting open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

Out of the best guys I follow- there's only 2 blue chips; Carter and hunter. 

Graham is short armed DT devalued, played next to a beast/team, he cheat by being a wrestler (pros will not care)

Warren is a white TE and boxes out defenders rather than getting open.

What?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...