Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 NFL Draft - Day 2 Discussion


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Edge LB or FS and I’m pretty happy. I think we might look at Moton’s replacement in round 3 or 4…

Using a 3rd or 4th rounder to try and find a long term answer at tackle is pretty much just burning a draft pick. Granted this organization does that no matter what position they draft but still.

I keep looking over their 30 visit list and it’s obvious they’re going to do address DT Edge and maybe if that tackle from Minnesota is still there. Like you said safety too. 

Doesn’t look like we met with Fanin or Taylor. We need a real TE1 too. We’re still a year away from truly competing so I’m of the mindset you take the best player because we lack talent everywhere versus trying to fill holes and over drafting  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

Using a 3rd or 4th rounder to try and find a long term answer at tackle is pretty much just burning a draft pick. Granted this organization does that no matter what position they draft but still.

I keep looking over their 30 visit list and it’s obvious they’re going to do address DT Edge and maybe if that tackle from Minnesota is still there. Like you said safety too. 

Doesn’t look like we met with Fanin or Taylor. We need a real TE1 too. We’re still a year away from truly competing so I’m of the mindset you take the best player because we lack talent everywhere versus trying to fill holes and over drafting  

There are veteran tight ends on the block too. Andrew's, Kittle, Goedert and Mayer. 

Edited by Lurk21
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...