Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKiNG NEWS: Panthers interested in trading for Trey Hendrickson


Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The Bears may have won the trade, but neither team has much to show for it. 

 

I think Parsons is great, but unless we are one player away from being a SB contender, i avoid that deal like the plague.

I wouldn't call that great criteria for a trade(SB contention). If that's the criteria than probably 99.9% of all NFL trades have failed. 

Mack was the better contributor versus what he was traded for. That's the most basic criteria, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I wouldn't call that great criteria for a trade(SB contention). If that's the criteria than probably 99.9% of all NFL trades have failed. 

Mack was the better contributor versus what he was traded for. That's the most basic criteria, IMO.

I would. IMO, you only make a trade like that if it makes you a SB contender.  If it doesn't, then it was a waste of assets.  Had Chicago not made the trade, they might have gotten good players cheaper.

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sounds like the Bengals and Hendrickson are on the verge of working out an extension.

Their OL and the rest of their defense are going to be booty cheeks for the foreseeable future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sounds like the Bengals and Hendrickson are on the verge of working out an extension.

Not surprised as they had already agreed on contract length and APY, they were just really far apart on GPY. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Navy_football said:

Yeah, but those receivers though. 

I really thought that laying Higgins was a mistake. Not that he isn't a legit 1B WR, it's just that you only have so much cap to go around and you already have a QB and another WR making mega bucks with a trash tier OL and D. Seemed like the perfect candidate for a tag and trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Navy_football said:

Yeah, but those receivers though. 

The Colts under Ryan Grigson made protecting Andrew Luck a lower priority than adding "weapons". 

We saw how that worked out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...